This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019TA0253
Case T-253/19: Judgment of the General Court of 14 July 2021 — BG v Parliament (Civil service — Accredited parliamentary assistants — Termination of the contract — Breakdown in the relationship of trust — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Psychological harassment — Request for assistance — Retaliation — Manifest errors of assessment — Liability)
Case T-253/19: Judgment of the General Court of 14 July 2021 — BG v Parliament (Civil service — Accredited parliamentary assistants — Termination of the contract — Breakdown in the relationship of trust — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Psychological harassment — Request for assistance — Retaliation — Manifest errors of assessment — Liability)
Case T-253/19: Judgment of the General Court of 14 July 2021 — BG v Parliament (Civil service — Accredited parliamentary assistants — Termination of the contract — Breakdown in the relationship of trust — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Psychological harassment — Request for assistance — Retaliation — Manifest errors of assessment — Liability)
OJ C 357, 6.9.2021, p. 19–20
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 14/07/2021
- Date lodged:
- 15/04/2019
- Author:
- General Court
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- English
- Type of procedure:
- Action for damages, Staff cases
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Related EU case-law document 62019TJ0253
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
|
6.9.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 357/19 |
Judgment of the General Court of 14 July 2021 — BG v Parliament
(Case T-253/19) (1)
(Civil service - Accredited parliamentary assistants - Termination of the contract - Breakdown in the relationship of trust - Obligation to state reasons - Right to be heard - Psychological harassment - Request for assistance - Retaliation - Manifest errors of assessment - Liability)
(2021/C 357/30)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: BG (represented by: L. Levi, A. Champetier and A. Tymen, lawyers)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: I. Lázaro Betancor and I. Terwinghe, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application under Article 270 TFEU for, first, annulment of the Parliament’s decision of 18 May 2018 to terminate the applicant’s contract as an accredited parliamentary assistant and, secondly, compensation for the non-material damage which she claims to have suffered.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders BG to pay the costs. |
