This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019CN0908
Case C-908/19 P: Appeal brought on 10 December 2019 by European Food SA against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 10 October 2019 in Case T-536/18, Société des produits Nestlé v EUIPO — European Food (FITNESS)
Case C-908/19 P: Appeal brought on 10 December 2019 by European Food SA against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 10 October 2019 in Case T-536/18, Société des produits Nestlé v EUIPO — European Food (FITNESS)
Case C-908/19 P: Appeal brought on 10 December 2019 by European Food SA against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 10 October 2019 in Case T-536/18, Société des produits Nestlé v EUIPO — European Food (FITNESS)
OJ C 201, 15.6.2020, p. 5–5
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 10/12/2019
- Date lodged:
- 10/12/2019
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- English
- Type of procedure:
- Action for annulment, Appeal - inadmissible
- Other parties to the proceedings:
- European Union Intellectual Property Office
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Request to review the judgment 62018TJ0536
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
|
15.6.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 201/5 |
Appeal brought on 10 December 2019 by European Food SA against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 10 October 2019 in Case T-536/18, Société des produits Nestlé v EUIPO — European Food (FITNESS)
(Case C-908/19 P)
(2020/C 201/07)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: European Food SA (represented by: R. Dincă, I. Speciac, V. Stănese, I.-F. Cofaru, avocați)
Other parties to the proceedings: Société des produits Nestlé, European Union Intellectual Property Office
By order of 18 March 2020, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) decided that the appeal should not be allowed to proceed and ordered the appellant to bear its own costs.
