This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019CN0495
Case C-495/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Poznaniu (Poland) lodged on 26 June 2019 – Kancelaria Medius SA, established in Kraków v RN
Case C-495/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Poznaniu (Poland) lodged on 26 June 2019 – Kancelaria Medius SA, established in Kraków v RN
Case C-495/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Poznaniu (Poland) lodged on 26 June 2019 – Kancelaria Medius SA, established in Kraków v RN
OJ C 337, 7.10.2019, p. 6–6
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
7.10.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 337/6 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Poznaniu (Poland) lodged on 26 June 2019 – Kancelaria Medius SA, established in Kraków v RN
(Case C-495/19)
(2019/C 337/06)
Language of the case: Polish
Referring court
Sąd Okręgowy w Poznaniu
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Kancelaria Medius SA, established in Kraków
Defendant: RN
Question referred
Should Article 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (1) be interpreted as precluding procedural rules under which a court may issue a default judgment on the basis merely of an applicant’s statements contained in the application, and which the court is obliged to accept as true, in a case where the defendant (a consumer), who has been duly notified of the date of the hearing, does not appear when summoned and does not mount a defence?