Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62019CA0529

Case C-529/19: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Potsdam — Germany) — Möbel Kraft GmbH & Co. KG v ML (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 2011/83/EU — Article 16(c) — Right of withdrawal — Exceptions — Goods made to the consumer’s specifications or clearly personalised — Goods which the trader has begun to produce)

OJ C 423, 7.12.2020, p. 9–9 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

7.12.2020   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 423/9


Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Potsdam — Germany) — Möbel Kraft GmbH & Co. KG v ML

(Case C-529/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Consumer protection - Directive 2011/83/EU - Article 16(c) - Right of withdrawal - Exceptions - Goods made to the consumer’s specifications or clearly personalised - Goods which the trader has begun to produce)

(2020/C 423/13)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Potsdam

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Möbel Kraft GmbH & Co. KG

Defendant: ML

Operative part of the judgment

Article 16(c) of Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council must be interpreted as meaning that the exception to the right of withdrawal laid down in that provision may be relied on against a consumer who has concluded an off-premises contract for the sale of goods which are to be made to his or her specifications, irrespective of whether the trader has begun to produce those goods.


(1)  OJ C 348, 14.11.2019.


Top