Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62018TN0439

    Case T-439/18: Action brought on 13 July 2018 — Sintokogio v EUIPO (ProAssist)

    OJ C 328, 17.9.2018, p. 53–53 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    13/07/2018
    Date lodged:
    13/07/2018
    Author:
    General Court
    Form:
    Judicial information
    Authentic language:
    English
    Type of procedure:
    Action for annulment
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Instruments cited in case law:
    Link

    17.9.2018   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 328/53

    Action brought on 13 July 2018 — Sintokogio v EUIPO (ProAssist)

    (Case T-439/18)

    (2018/C 328/72)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Sintokogio Ltd (Nagoya, Japan) (represented by: V. Dalichau, S. Kirschstein-Freund, B. Breitinger, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark ProAssist — Application for registration No 1 327 746

    Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 May 2018 in Case R 2341/2017-2

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    annul the contested decision concerning the EU Part of International Registration 1327746;

    —

    alternatively amend the contested decision concerning the EU Part of International Registration 1327746;

    —

    order EUIPO to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings and of the proceedings before the Court.

    Pleas in law

    —

    Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

    —

    Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

    —

    Infringement of the Principle of equal treatment and sound administration, Article 107 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
    Top