Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62018CN0574

Case C-574/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 13 September 2018 — C-eG v Z Tax Office

OJ C 427, 26.11.2018, p. 16–17 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

Date of document:
13/09/2018
Date lodged:
13/09/2018
Author:
Court of Justice
Form:
Judicial information
Authentic language:
German
Type of procedure:
Reference for a preliminary ruling
Link
Select all documents mentioning this document
Case affecting:
  • Submits a preliminary question about 31977L0388 article 11 part A paragraph 1 point (a)
  • Submits a preliminary question about 31977L0388 article 20
  • Submits a preliminary question about 31977L0388 article 27 paragraph 1
  • Submits a preliminary question about 31996R2200 article 11 paragraph 1
  • Submits a preliminary question about 31996R2200 article 15
Link

26.11.2018   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/16

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 13 September 2018 — C-eG v Z Tax Office

(Case C-574/18)

(2018/C 427/23)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant and appellant in the appeal on a point of law: C-eG

Defendant and respondent in the appeal on a point of law: Z Tax Office

Questions referred

1.

Under circumstances such as those of the main proceedings, in which a producer organisation within the meaning of Article 11(1) and Article 15 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 of 28 October 1996 on the common organization of the market in fruit and vegetables (Regulation No 2200/96) (1) supplies goods to the producers that are its members and receives for this from the producers a payment which does not cover the purchase price,

a)

is an exchange with a cash supplement deemed to exist because the producers, in return for the supply, have contractually undertaken vis-a-vis the producer organisation to deliver fruit and vegetables to the producer organisation for the duration of the earmarking period, with the consequence that the taxable amount of the supply is the purchase price for the capital goods paid by the producer organisation to the upstream suppliers?

b)

is the entirety of the amount which the operational fund actually pays to the producer organisation for the supply a ‘subsidy directly linked to the price of such supplies’ within the meaning of Article 11(A)(1)(a) of the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes (Directive 77/388/EEC), (2) with the consequence that the taxable amount also encompasses the financial assistance within the meaning of Article 15 of Regulation No 2200/96 which has been granted to the operational fund by the competent authorities on the basis of an operational programme?

2.

If, on the basis of the answer to question 1, only the payments made by the producers, but not the supply obligation and the financial assistance, are to be taken as the taxable amount: under the circumstances specified in question 1, does Article 11(A)(1)(a) of Directive 77/388/EEC preclude a national special measure based on Article 27(1) of Directive 77/388/EEC such as Paragraph 10(5)(1) of the Umsatzsteuergesetz (Law on turnover tax; ‘the UStG’), according to which the taxable amount of the supplies to the producers is the purchase price for the capital goods paid by the producer organisation to the upstream suppliers because the producers are related parties?

3.

If the answer to question 2 is in the negative: is this also the case if the producers have a full right of deduction because the capital goods are subject to adjustments of deductions (Article 20 of Directive 77/388/EEC)?

(1)  OJ 1996 L 297, p. 1.

(2)  OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1.

Top