Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62017TN0362

    Case T-362/17: Action brought on 6 June 2017 — NCL v EUIPO (FEEL FREE)

    Information about publishing Official Journal not found, p. 43–43 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    06/06/2017
    Date lodged:
    06/06/2017
    Author:
    General Court
    Form:
    Judicial information
    Authentic language:
    German
    Type of procedure:
    Action for annulment
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Instruments cited in case law:
    Link

    31.7.2017   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 249/43

    Action brought on 6 June 2017 — NCL v EUIPO (FEEL FREE)

    (Case T-362/17)

    (2017/C 249/58)

    Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Applicant: NCL Corporation Ltd (Miami, Florida, United States) (represented by: J. Bühling and D. Graetsch, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘FEEL FREE’ — Application for registration No 15 090 533

    Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 March 2017 in Case R 2094/2016-4

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    annul the contested decision;

    —

    order EUIPO to pay the costs.

    Plea in law relied on

    —

    Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
    Top