This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TJ0418
Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 September 2018.#Eduard Meier GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Safari Club — Earlier national figurative mark WS Walk Safari — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-418/17.
Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 September 2018.
Eduard Meier GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Safari Club — Earlier national figurative mark WS Walk Safari — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).
Case T-418/17.
Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 September 2018.
Eduard Meier GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Safari Club — Earlier national figurative mark WS Walk Safari — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).
Case T-418/17.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2018:540
- Date of document:
- 13/09/2018
- Date lodged:
- 04/07/2017
- Author:
- General Court
- Country or organisation from which the request originates:
- Germany
- Form:
- Judgment
- Authentic language:
- English
- Type of procedure:
- Action for annulment - unfounded, Action for annulment - successful
- Applicant:
- Individual
- Defendant:
- European Union Intellectual Property Office, EU institutions and bodies
- Judge-Rapporteur:
- Madise
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Affected by case:
-
- Related judicial information 62017TA0418
- Instruments cited in case law:
-
- 32009R0207: N 1
- 32009R0207-A08P2LAPT2: N 16
- 32009R0207-A65: N 30
- 32009R0207-A41: N 5
- 32009R0207-A08P1LB: N 7 13 15 18 19
- 61995CJ0251-N23: N 22
- 61997CJ0039-N17: N 55
- 61997CJ0342-N25: N 22
- 62001TJ0006-N35: N 36
- 62001TJ0006-N30: N 39
- 62001TJ0162-N30: N 17
- 62001TJ0162-N31: N 17
- 62001TJ0162-N32: N 17
- 62001TJ0162-N33: N 17
- 62003TJ0081-N76: N 19
- 62003TJ0081-N74: N 55
- 62003TJ0117-N49: N 64
- 62003TJ0117-N50: N 64
- 62003TJ0153-N35: N 23
- 62003TJ0317-N46: N 39
- 62004TJ0346-N19: N 30
- 62004TJ0363-N92: N 27
- 62005CJ0334-N42: N 26
- 62006CJ0193-N43: N 26
- 62006TJ0242-N51: N 23
- 62006TJ0242-N52: N 27
- 62006TJ0363-N30: N 44
- 62007TJ0316-N42: N 18
- 62012TJ0247-N35: N 25
- 62012TJ0247-N36: N 25
- 62012TJ0338-N23: N 36
- 62012TJ0349-N23: N 44
- 62014TJ0816-N63: N 24
- 62015TJ0504-N31: N 24
- 62017TJ0210-N34: N 33
- 62017TJ0210-N74: N 56 62
- 62017TJ0210-N59: N 63
- 62017TJ0210-N75: N 65
- Subject matter:
- Case law directory code:
-
