EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TJ0413
Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 June 2018.#Karl Storz GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark 3D — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Absence of any distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-413/17.
Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 June 2018.
Karl Storz GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark 3D — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Absence of any distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001).
Case T-413/17.
Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 June 2018.
Karl Storz GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark 3D — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Absence of any distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001).
Case T-413/17.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2018:356
- Date of document:
- 19/06/2018
- Date lodged:
- 29/06/2017
- Author:
- General Court
- Country or organisation from which the request originates:
- Germany
- Form:
- Judgment
- Additional information:
- POURVOI C-783/18 P
- Authentic language:
- English
- Type of procedure:
- Action for annulment - inadmissible, Action for annulment - successful, Action for annulment - unfounded
- Applicant:
- Individual
- Defendant:
- European Union Intellectual Property Office, EU institutions and bodies
- Judge-Rapporteur:
- Berardis
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Affected by case:
-
- Related judicial information 62017TA0413
- Instruments cited in case law:
-
- 12008E296-L2: N 36
- 32009R0207: N 1 78
- 32009R0207-A75P1: N 15 36
- 32009R0207-A65: N 18
- 32009R0207-A07P1LC: N 4 11 15 23 - 25 30 40 51 57 62 82 86
- 32009R0207-A07P1LB: N 4 12 86 87 89 93
- 32009R0207-A07P2: N 4 30
- 32015Q0423(01)-A188: N 18
- 62004TJ0346-N71: N 78
- 62005CJ0412-N65: N 78
- 62006TJ0207-N47: N 86
- 62007TJ0405-N56: N 49
- 62010CJ0051-N73: N 79
- 62010CJ0051-N74: N 79
- 62010CJ0051-N75: N 79
- 62010CJ0051-N76: N 79
- 62010TJ0513-N11: N 90
- 62012TJ0061-N36: N 51
- 62012TJ0061-N37: N 51
- 62012TJ0366-N30: N 29
- 62013TJ0492-N41: N 59
- 62014TJ0181-N44: N 80
- 62015CJ0437-N30: N 37
- 62015CJ0437-N31: N 38
- 62015TJ0079-N16: N 24
- 62015TJ0079-N17: N 25
- 62015TJ0079-N18: N 26
- 62015TJ0079-N19: N 27
- 62015TJ0079-N26: N 32
- 62015TJ0335-N32: N 66
- 62015TJ0355-N15: N 18
- 62015TJ0529-N14: N 36
- 62015TJ0529-N16: N 37
- 62015TJ0529-N17: N 38
- 62015TJ0529-N18: N 39
- 62015TJ0670-N88: N 30
- 62016TJ0064-N25: N 29
- 62016TJ0064-N26: N 29
- 62016TJ0395-N48: N 83
- 62016TJ0878-N27: N 30
- Subject matter:
- Case law directory code:
-
