This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TJ0384
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 25 September 2018.#Republic of Cyprus v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark BBQLOUMI — Prior United Kingdom word certification mark HALLOUMI — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Rejection of the opposition — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-384/17.
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 25 September 2018.
Republic of Cyprus v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark BBQLOUMI — Prior United Kingdom word certification mark HALLOUMI — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Rejection of the opposition — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).
Case T-384/17.
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 25 September 2018.
Republic of Cyprus v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark BBQLOUMI — Prior United Kingdom word certification mark HALLOUMI — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Rejection of the opposition — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).
Case T-384/17.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2018:593
- Date of document:
- 25/09/2018
- Date lodged:
- 21/06/2017
- Author:
- General Court
- Country or organisation from which the request originates:
- Cyprus
- Form:
- Judgment
- Additional information:
- POURVOI C-767/18 P
- Authentic language:
- English
- Type of procedure:
- Action for annulment - unfounded
- Applicant:
- EU Member States, Cyprus
- Defendant:
- European Union Intellectual Property Office, EU institutions and bodies
- Judge-Rapporteur:
- Schalin
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Affected by case:
-
- Related judicial information 62017TA0384
- Review of judgement requested by 62018CN0767
- Instruments cited in case law:
-
- 32008L0095-A01: N 29
- 32008L0095-A15: N 40
- 32009R0207: N 1 39 42
- 32009R0207-A08P2: N 12 31
- 32009R0207-A08P2LAPT2: N 23 37 41
- 32009R0207-A07P1LB: N 32 37
- 32009R0207-A07P1LC: N 32 37
- 32009R0207-A41: N 5
- 32009R0207-C8: N 70
- 32009R0207-A08P5: N 8
- 32009R0207-A08P1LB: N 8 12 21 23 25 37 47 48 76
- 32017R1001-A83P1: N 39
- 61995CJ0251-N24: N 70
- 61997CJ0039-N18: N 36 70
- 61997CJ0039-N17: N 69
- 61997CJ0342-N20: N 70
- 62000TJ0032-N47: N 42
- 62001TJ0162-N30: N 24 36
- 62001TJ0162-N31: N 24 36
- 62001TJ0162-N32: N 24 36
- 62001TJ0162-N33: N 24 36
- 62002TJ0359-N43: N 57
- 62003TJ0081-N74: N 69
- 62004TJ0256-N42: N 26
- 62005CJ0334-N35: N 55
- 62005CJ0334-N41: N 56
- 62005CJ0334-N42: N 56
- 62005TJ0013-N46: N 28
- 62006CJ0193-N42: N 56
- 62006CJ0193-N43: N 56
- 62006TJ0111-N64: N 27
- 62006TJ0363-N30: N 59 65
- 62009TJ0358-N45: N 73
- 62010TJ0534-N41: N 43
- 62010TJ0534-N55: N 49 74
- 62010TJ0534-N54: N 74
- 62011CJ0196: N 34 42
- 62011CJ0196-N43: N 37
- 62011CJ0196-N44: N 37
- 62011CJ0196-N45: N 37
- 62011CJ0196-N46: N 37
- 62011CJ0196-N47: N 37
- 62013TJ0624-N24: N 25
- 62014TJ0292: N 13 32
- 62014TJ0292-N35: N 39
- 62014TJ0292-N20: N 43
- 62014TJ0292-N21: N 43
- 62015CJ0689-N49: N 47
- 62015CJ0689-N50: N 47
- Subject matter:
- Case law directory code:
-
