This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TJ0057
Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 July 2018.#Pegasus v European Parliament.#Institutional law — European Parliament — Decision awarding a grant to a political foundation — Pre-financing set at 33% of the maximum amount of the grant awarded — Obligation to provide a bank pre-financing guarantee — Financial Regulation — Rules of Application of the Financial Regulation — Regulation (EC) No 2004/2003 on the regulations governing political parties at European level and the rules regarding their funding — Proportionality — Equal treatment.#Case T-57/17.
Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 July 2018.
Pegasus v European Parliament.
Institutional law — European Parliament — Decision awarding a grant to a political foundation — Pre-financing set at 33% of the maximum amount of the grant awarded — Obligation to provide a bank pre-financing guarantee — Financial Regulation — Rules of Application of the Financial Regulation — Regulation (EC) No 2004/2003 on the regulations governing political parties at European level and the rules regarding their funding — Proportionality — Equal treatment.
Case T-57/17.
Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 July 2018.
Pegasus v European Parliament.
Institutional law — European Parliament — Decision awarding a grant to a political foundation — Pre-financing set at 33% of the maximum amount of the grant awarded — Obligation to provide a bank pre-financing guarantee — Financial Regulation — Rules of Application of the Financial Regulation — Regulation (EC) No 2004/2003 on the regulations governing political parties at European level and the rules regarding their funding — Proportionality — Equal treatment.
Case T-57/17.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2018:425
- Date of document:
- 11/07/2018
- Date lodged:
- 31/01/2017
- Author:
- General Court
- Country or organisation from which the request originates:
- Belgium
- Form:
- Judgment
- Authentic language:
- German
- Type of procedure:
- Action for annulment - unfounded
- Applicant:
- Individual
- Defendant:
- EU institutions and bodies, European Parliament
- Judge-Rapporteur:
- Barents
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Affected by case:
-
- Related judicial information 62017TA0057
- Instruments cited in case law:
-
- 12007P011: N 18 127 129
- 12007P012: N 18 127 129
- 12007P020: N 18
- 12007P047: N 31 36 39
- 12007P047-L1: N 35
- 12008E263: N 37
- 32003R2004-A02PT3: N 1
- 32003R2004-A02PT4: N 1
- 32003R2004: N 2 3 119 121 130
- 32003R2004-A03P1LB: N 3 9 31 59 63 65 - 67 70 - 73 75
- 32003R2004-A10P2: N 50
- 32003R2004-A03P2: N 54
- 32003R2004-A10: N 54
- 32003R2004-A07P3: N 55
- 32003R2004-A08: N 55
- 32003R2004-A03P1LBL1: N 61
- 32003R2004-A03: N 62
- 32003R2004-A04P3: N 62
- 32003R2004-A05P3: N 63
- 32003R2004-A05P6: N 79
- 32003R2004-A03P2LC: N 9 31 76 78 79 82 83 85 87 - 89
- 32003R2004-A05P5: N 9 64
- 32012R0966: N 18 71
- 32012R0966-A134P2: N 20 23 30
- 32012R0966-A134P1: N 9 23 32 58 73 75 76 87 89
- 32012R1268: N 18 71
- 32012R1268-A185: N 25
- 32012R1268-A202P2: N 45
- 32012R1268-A206P1: N 9 20 24 30 32 58 73 75 76 87 89 111 113
- 32014D0304(01)-N1: N 46
- 32014D0304(01)-A06P3LC: N 47
- 32014D0304(01)-A06P3LF: N 47
- 32014D0304(01)-A06P3LA: N 47 81
- 32014D0304(01)-A07P3: N 55
- 32014D0304(01)-A03P1: N 62
- 32014D0304(01)-A04P2L3: N 62
- 32014D0304(01): N 71 72 119 121
- 32014D0304(01)-A06P1: N 95
- 32015Q0423(01)-A152: N 12
- 32015Q0423(01)-A106P2: N 15
- 32015Q0423(01)-A106P3: N 15
- 62008CJ0033-N31: N 94
- 62009CJ0236-N28: N 117
- 62011CJ0300-N53: N 36
- 62011TJ0553-N318: N 104
- 62013CJ0398-N22: N 69
- 62013CJ0437-N20: N 36
- 62014CJ0562-N63: N 69
- 62016CJ0190-N30: N 117
- 62016CJ0296-N46: N 38
- Subject matter:
- Case law directory code:
-
