This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017CN0471
Case C-471/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 7 August 2017 — Kreyenhop & Kluge GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt Hannover
Case C-471/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 7 August 2017 — Kreyenhop & Kluge GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt Hannover
Case C-471/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 7 August 2017 — Kreyenhop & Kluge GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt Hannover
OJ C 374, 6.11.2017, p. 15–15
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
6.11.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 374/15 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 7 August 2017 — Kreyenhop & Kluge GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt Hannover
(Case C-471/17)
(2017/C 374/20)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Finanzgericht Hamburg
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Kreyenhop & Kluge GmbH & Co. KG
Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hannover
Question referred
Are fried noodles ‘dried’ pasta within the meaning of CN subheading 1902 3010? (1)
(1) Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1).