Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62017CN0372

    Case C-372/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Noord-Holland (Netherlands) lodged on 19 June 2017 — Vision Research Europe BV v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane kantoor Rotterdam Rijnmond

    OJ C 300, 11.9.2017, p. 17–18 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    11.9.2017   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 300/17


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Noord-Holland (Netherlands) lodged on 19 June 2017 — Vision Research Europe BV v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane kantoor Rotterdam Rijnmond

    (Case C-372/17)

    (2017/C 300/21)

    Language of the case: Dutch

    Referring court

    Rechtbank Noord-Holland

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Vision Research Europe BV

    Defendant: Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane kantoor Rotterdam Rijnmond

    Question referred

    Is Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 113/2014 (1) of 4 February 2014 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature valid if the Rechtbank is correct in its provisional view that subheading 8525 80 30 should be interpreted as meaning that the camera, as described in 2 and 12 above, which has a volatile memory whereby the images captured in the camera are lost when subsequent images are captured or when the camera is switched off, can be classified thereunder?


    (1)  OJ 2014 L 38, p. 20.


    Top