This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TN0106
Case T-106/16: Action brought on 17 March 2016 — zero v EUIPO — Hemming (ZIRO)
Case T-106/16: Action brought on 17 March 2016 — zero v EUIPO — Hemming (ZIRO)
Case T-106/16: Action brought on 17 March 2016 — zero v EUIPO — Hemming (ZIRO)
OJ C 175, 17.5.2016, p. 18–18
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 17/03/2016
- Date lodged:
- 17/03/2016
- Author:
- General Court
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- English
- Type of procedure:
- Action for annulment
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
|
17.5.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 175/18 |
Action brought on 17 March 2016 — zero v EUIPO — Hemming (ZIRO)
(Case T-106/16)
(2016/C 175/21)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: zero Holding GmbH & Co. KG (Bremen, Germany) (represented by: M. Nentwig, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Oliver Hemming (Cadbury, United Kingdom)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘ZIRO’ — EU trade mark application No 12 264 958
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 January 2016 in Case R 71/2015-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
|
— |
Infringement of Article 75, second sentence, of Regulation No 207/2009. |
