Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62016TA0905

    Case T-905/16: Judgment of the General Court of 12 September 2018 — Chefaro Ireland v EUIPO — Laboratoires M&L (NUIT PRECIEUSE) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark NUIT PRECIEUSE — Earlier national word mark EAU PRECIEUSE — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

    OJ C 381, 22.10.2018, p. 21–22 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    22.10.2018   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 381/21


    Judgment of the General Court of 12 September 2018 — Chefaro Ireland v EUIPO — Laboratoires M&L (NUIT PRECIEUSE)

    (Case T-905/16) (1)

    ((EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark NUIT PRECIEUSE - Earlier national word mark EAU PRECIEUSE - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))

    (2018/C 381/24)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Chefaro Ireland DAC (Dublin, Ireland)) (represented by: P. Maeyaert and J. Muyldermans, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė, D. Walicka and D. Gája, acting as Agents)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Laboratoires M&L SA (Manosque, France)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 October 2016 (Case R 2596/2015-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between Chefaro Ireland and Laboratoires M&L.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Chefaro Ireland DAC to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 53, 20.2.2017.


    Top