Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62016CN0252

    Case C-252/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht München (Germany) lodged on 2 May 2016 — Gesellschaft für musikalische Aufführungs- und mechanische Vervielfältigungsrechte, Bezirksdirektion Nürnberg (GEMA) v Josef Ebert

    OJ C 279, 1.8.2016, p. 15–15 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    02/05/2016
    Date lodged:
    02/05/2016
    Author:
    Court of Justice
    Form:
    Judicial information
    Authentic language:
    German
    Type of procedure:
    Reference for a preliminary ruling
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Case affecting:
    Link

    1.8.2016   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 279/15

    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht München (Germany) lodged on 2 May 2016 — Gesellschaft für musikalische Aufführungs- und mechanische Vervielfältigungsrechte, Bezirksdirektion Nürnberg (GEMA) v Josef Ebert

    (Case C-252/16)

    (2016/C 279/20)

    Language of the case: German

    Referring court

    Amtsgericht München

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Gesellschaft für musikalische Aufführungs- und mechanische Vervielfältigungsrechte, Bezirksdirektion Nürnberg (GEMA)

    Defendant: Josef Ebert

    By decision of 31 May 2016, the Court removed the case from the Court’s Register

    Top