Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62015TN0343

    Case T-343/15: Action brought on 27 June 2015 — Polski Koncern Naftowy Orlen v OHIM (Shape of a service station)

    Information about publishing Official Journal not found, p. 48–49 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    27/06/2015
    Date lodged:
    27/06/2015
    Author:
    General Court
    Form:
    Judicial information
    Authentic language:
    Polish
    Type of procedure:
    Action for annulment
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Instruments cited in case law:
    Link

    24.8.2015   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 279/48

    Action brought on 27 June 2015 — Polski Koncern Naftowy Orlen v OHIM (Shape of a service station)

    (Case T-343/15)

    (2015/C 279/61)

    Language of the case: Polish

    Parties

    Applicant: Polski Koncern Naftowy Orlen SA (Płock, Poland) (represented by: M. Siciarek, lawyer)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

    Details of the proceedings before OHIM

    Trade mark at issue: Three-dimensional Community trade mark (Shape of a service station) — Application No 12 416 954

    Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 April 2015 in Case R 2250/2014-5

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    annul the contested decision;

    —

    order OHIM to pay the costs, including those of the applicant in the course of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM and before the Court.

    Plea in law

    —

    Infringement of Article 7(1)(b), Article 7(2) and Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.
    Top