This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015TJ0217
Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 November 2016.#Fiesta Hotels & Resorts, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark PALLADIUM PALACE IBIZA RESORT & SPA — Earlier national trade name GRAND HOTEL PALLADIUM — Relative ground for refusal — Use in the course of trade of a sign of more than mere local significance — Article 8(4) and Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.#Case T-217/15.
Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 November 2016.
Fiesta Hotels & Resorts, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark PALLADIUM PALACE IBIZA RESORT & SPA — Earlier national trade name GRAND HOTEL PALLADIUM — Relative ground for refusal — Use in the course of trade of a sign of more than mere local significance — Article 8(4) and Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
Case T-217/15.
Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 November 2016.
Fiesta Hotels & Resorts, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark PALLADIUM PALACE IBIZA RESORT & SPA — Earlier national trade name GRAND HOTEL PALLADIUM — Relative ground for refusal — Use in the course of trade of a sign of more than mere local significance — Article 8(4) and Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
Case T-217/15.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2016:691
- Date of document:
- 30/11/2016
- Date lodged:
- 30/04/2015
- Author:
- General Court
- Country or organisation from which the request originates:
- Spain
- Form:
- Judgment
- Additional information:
- POURVOI C-75/17 P
- Authentic language:
- Spanish
- Type of procedure:
- Action for annulment - decision unnecessary
- Judge-Rapporteur:
- Valančius
- Treaty:
- Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Affected by case:
-
- Related judicial information 62015TA0217
- Confirmed by 62017CJ0075
- Review of judgement requested by 62017CN0075
- Instruments cited in case law:
-
- 32009R0207-A01P2: N 15
- 32009R0207-A08P1: N 74 78
- 32009R0207-A08P1LB: N 13 74 77 90
- 32009R0207-A08P4: N 13 - 16 19 22 23 32 35 40 52 57 64 - 72
- 32009R0207-A08P4LA: N 17 35
- 32009R0207-A08P4LB: N 17
- 32009R0207-A52P1LB: N 90
- 32009R0207-A53P1: N 35
- 32009R0207-A53P1LC: N 13 - 15 35 64
- 32009R0207-A53P2: N 35
- 32009R0207-A65: N 39 40 83
- 32009R0207-A65P2: N 38
- 32009R0207-A76: N 38
- 32009R0207-A76P1: N 86 87
- 32009R0207: N 1 16 17 25 27
- 32015Q0423(01)-A188: N 38 39 85
- 62003TJ0066-N45: N 39
- 62004TJ0346-N19: N 39
- 62006TJ0318-N32: N 15
- 62006TJ0318-N36: N 22
- 62006TJ0318-N37: N 23
- 62006TJ0318-N38: N 23
- 62006TJ0318-N41: N 26
- 62006TJ0318-N42: N 25
- 62006TJ0318-N43: N 25 27
- 62006TJ0318-N47: N 15
- 62007CJ0498-N82: N 88
- 62007TJ0114-N47: N 57
- 62008TJ0303-N91: N 57
- 62009CJ0096: N 41 42
- 62009CJ0096-N157: N 22
- 62009CJ0096-N158: N 24
- 62009CJ0096-N159: N 24
- 62009CJ0096-N166: N 35
- 62009CJ0096-N190: N 17 57
- 62009CJ0096-N191: N 67
- 62009CJ0096-N94: N 64
- 62009CJ0096-N95: N 64
- 62009TJ0474-N31: N 88
- 62010CO0546-N41: N 83
- 62010TJ0579-N54: N 15
- 62010TJ0579-N55: N 16
- 62010TJ0579-N56: N 17
- 62010TJ0579-N61: N 83
- 62010TJ0579-N62: N 82
- 62010TJ0579-N65: N 82
- 62010TJ0579-N70: N 35
- 62011TJ0453-N37: N 71
- 62011TJ0506-N22: N 67
- 62011TJ0506-N49: N 23
- 62011TJ0506-N50: N 24
- 62011TJ0506-N52: N 26
- 62011TJ0506-N53: N 25
- 62013TJ0096-N15: N 81
- 62013TJ0344-N24: N 52
- 62014TJ0085-N63: N 17
- 62014TJ0778-N28: N 20
- Subject matter:
- Case law directory code:
-
