Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62014TN0654

Case T-654/14: Action brought on 8 September 2014 — Revolution v OHIM (REVOLUTION)

OJ C 388, 3.11.2014, p. 21–22 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

Date of document:
08/09/2014
Date lodged:
08/09/2014
Author:
General Court
Form:
Judicial information
Authentic language:
English
Link
Select all documents mentioning this document
Instruments cited in case law:
Link

3.11.2014   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 388/21

Action brought on 8 September 2014 — Revolution v OHIM (REVOLUTION)

(Case T-654/14)

2014/C 388/26

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Revolution LLC (Washington, United States) (represented by: P. Roncaglia, F. Rossi and N. Parrotta, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 June 2014 given in Case R 2143/2013-1;

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The work mark ‘REVOLUTION’ for services in Class 36 — Community trade mark application No 1 1 8 15  297

Decision of the Examiner: Rejected the application for CTM registration

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and 7(2) of the Regulation No 207/2009

Top