Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62014TN0654

    Case T-654/14: Action brought on 8 September 2014 — Revolution v OHIM (REVOLUTION)

    OJ C 388, 3.11.2014, p. 21–22 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    3.11.2014   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 388/21


    Action brought on 8 September 2014 — Revolution v OHIM (REVOLUTION)

    (Case T-654/14)

    2014/C 388/26

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Revolution LLC (Washington, United States) (represented by: P. Roncaglia, F. Rossi and N. Parrotta, lawyers)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 June 2014 given in Case R 2143/2013-1;

    Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    Community trade mark concerned: The work mark ‘REVOLUTION’ for services in Class 36 — Community trade mark application No 1 1 8 15  297

    Decision of the Examiner: Rejected the application for CTM registration

    Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

    Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and 7(2) of the Regulation No 207/2009


    Top