Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62014CN0222

    Case C-222/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Simvoulio tis Epikratias (Council of State) lodged on 7 May 2014  — Konstantinos Maistrellis v Minister for Justice, Transparency and Human Rights

    OJ C 235, 21.7.2014, p. 8–8 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    21.7.2014   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 235/8


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Simvoulio tis Epikratias (Council of State) lodged on 7 May 2014 — Konstantinos Maistrellis v Minister for Justice, Transparency and Human Rights

    (Case C-222/14)

    2014/C 235/11

    Language of the case: Greek

    Referring court

    Simvoulio tis Epikratias (Council of State)

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Konstantinos Maistrellis

    Defendant: Minister for Justice, Transparency and Human Rights

    Question referred

    Must the provisions of Directive 96/34/EC (1) and Directive 2006/54/EC (2), in so far as they are applicable, be interpreted as precluding national regulations, such as the contested provision of the third sentence of Article 53(3) of Law 3528/2007, providing that if the civil servant’s wife does not work or exercise any profession the male spouse is not entitled to parental leave, unless it is considered that due to a serious illness or injury the wife is unable to meet the needs related to the upbringing of the child?


    (1)  Council Directive 96/34/EC of 3 June 1996 on the framework agreement on parental leave concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC (OJ 1996 L 145, p. 4).

    (2)  Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (recast) (OJ 2006 L 204, p. 23).


    Top