Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62013TN0579

    Case T-579/13: Action brought on 6 November 2013 — Istituto Di Vigilanza Dell'Urbe v Commission

    OJ C 377, 21.12.2013, p. 18–19 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    06/11/2013
    Date lodged:
    06/11/2013
    Author:
    General Court
    Form:
    Judicial information
    Authentic language:
    Italian
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Instruments cited in case law:
    Link

    21.12.2013   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 377/18

    Action brought on 6 November 2013 — Istituto Di Vigilanza Dell'Urbe v Commission

    (Case T-579/13)

    2013/C 377/42

    Language of the Procedure: Italian

    Parties

    Applicant: Istituto Di Vigilanza Dell’Urbe SpA (Rome, Italy) (represented by: D. Dodaro and S. Cianciullo, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Commission

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    find that the tender of the successful tenderer, Città di Roma Metronotte s.r.l., fails to comply with the lex specialis governing tenders and in particular with point 5.2 of the specifications under which the tenders should have been drawn up in accordance ‘with European and national law concerning the transfer of undertakings and in particular with Directive 2001/23/EC and with the national measures implementing that directive’ with regard in particular to the ‘provisions for the safeguarding of employees’ rights in the event of a change of employer as a result of the legal transfer of an undertaking’;

    —

    find that the tender submitted by the Città di Roma Metronotte s.r.l. objectively infringes the principles of equal treatment and of competition, and is therefore contrary to the provisions contained in Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1268/2012 of 29 October 2012 on the rules of application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, Recital 42 of the preamble to which states that ‘[t]he purpose of the procedures for the award of contracts is to satisfy the needs of the institutions on the best possible terms while guaranteeing equal access to public contracts and complying with the principles of transparency and non-discrimination’;

    —

    consequently, annul the decision awarding the contract to Città di Roma Metronotte s.r.l. and set aside any contract that may have been concluded with that company;

    —

    order the European Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings;

    —

    order the European Commission to pay compensation for harm suffered.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    The present action is brought against the measure of the Representation of the European Commission in Italy, Commission ref. ARES (2013) 2936015, of 27 August 2013, concerning ‘PO/2013-11-SEC/ROM — Interinstitutional call for tenders concerning security guard and reception services at the European Union Houses in Rome and Milan, Italy — Lot 1: European Commission Representation and European Parliament Information Office’, which rejected the applicant’s tender.

    In support of its action, the applicant puts forward two pleas in law.

    1.

    First plea, alleging breach of the lex specialis governing tenders and infringement of the principle of equal treatment.

    —

    the applicant claims in that regard that the lex specialis provided that the successful tenderer of the service should have carried out the switch between contractors by employing the security guards previously employed by the outgoing contractor company on the same site. The successful tenderer however refused to carry out the switch between contractors; and that

    —

    by implicit confirmation of the award, the defendant infringed the principle of the equal treatment that calls for the drawing up and impartial application of unequivocal and uniform call for tender rules for all tenderers.

    2.

    Second plea, alleging breach of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1268/2012.

    —

    the applicant claims in that regard infringement of the principle, enshrined in Article 2 of Directive 2004/18/EC, according to which competitors are to be treated equally, and of the principles, reflected in that directive, according to which the interests of transparency and competition, as well as the relevant employment protection rules, are to be respected; and that

    —

    the successful tenderer could submit an economically advantageous tender only by not complying with the rules of the lex specialis governing tenders, of collective bargaining and of the European and national employment protection principles, with which the other tenderers complied.
    Top