This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013TN0318
Case T-318/13: Action brought on 13 June 2013 — Vita Phone v OHIM (LIFEDATA)
Case T-318/13: Action brought on 13 June 2013 — Vita Phone v OHIM (LIFEDATA)
Case T-318/13: Action brought on 13 June 2013 — Vita Phone v OHIM (LIFEDATA)
OJ C 226, 3.8.2013, p. 25–25
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
OJ C 226, 3.8.2013, p. 6–6
(HR)
- Date of document:
- 13/06/2013
- Date lodged:
- 13/06/2013
- Author:
- General Court
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- German
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
3.8.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 226/25 |
Action brought on 13 June 2013 — Vita Phone v OHIM (LIFEDATA)
(Case T-318/13)
(2013/C 226/34)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Vita Phone GmbH (Mannheim, Germany) (represented by P. Ruess and A. Doepner-Thiele, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 26 March 2013 in Case R 1072/2012-1; |
|
— |
Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘LIFEDATA’ for goods and services in Classes 10 and 44 — Community trade mark application No 10 525 053
Decision of the Examiner: the application was rejected
Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed
Pleas in law:
|
— |
Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 |
|
— |
Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 |
