Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62013TN0262

    Case T-262/13: Action brought on 15 May 2013 — Skysoft Computersysteme/OHIM — British Sky Broadcasting and Sky IP International (SKYSOFT)

    OJ C 207, 20.7.2013, p. 43–43 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
    OJ C 207, 20.7.2013, p. 11–11 (HR)

    20.7.2013   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 207/43


    Action brought on 15 May 2013 — Skysoft Computersysteme/OHIM — British Sky Broadcasting and Sky IP International (SKYSOFT)

    (Case T-262/13)

    2013/C 207/72

    Language in which the application was lodged: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Skysoft Computersysteme GmbH (Kleinmachnow, Germany) (represented by: P. Ehrlinger and T. Hagen, lawyers)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: British Sky Broadcasting Group plc and Sky IP International Ltd (Isleworth, United Kingdom)

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    Set aside the contested decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 March 2013, as it dismissed the appeal of the plaintiff against the decision of the OHIM Opposition Division of 30 September 2011 and did not reject the opposition of the intervening party;

    Order the intervening party to pay the costs of the proceedings including the costs incurred during the course of the appeal proceedings.

    Request the defendant to produce the annexes submitted by the intervening party and the plaintiff within the framework of the opposition proceedings.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

    Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘SKYSOFT’ — Community trade mark application No 4 782 645 for products and services in classes 9, 35, 37, 38 and 42

    Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

    Mark or sign cited in opposition: The word mark ‘SKY’ for goods and services in classes 9, 16, 18, 25, 28, 35, 38, 41 and 42

    Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition for all the contested goods and services

    Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

    Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) Council Regulation No 207/2009.


    Top