Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62013TN0213

    Case T-213/13: Action brought on 8 April 2013 — Square v OHIM — Caisse régionale de crédit agricole mutuel Pyrénées Gascogne (SQUARE)

    OJ C 207, 20.7.2013, p. 36–37 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
    OJ C 207, 20.7.2013, p. 10–10 (HR)

    20.7.2013   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 207/36


    Action brought on 8 April 2013 — Square v OHIM — Caisse régionale de crédit agricole mutuel Pyrénées Gascogne (SQUARE)

    (Case T-213/13)

    2013/C 207/60

    Language in which the application was lodged: French

    Parties

    Applicant: Square, Inc. (San Francisco, United States) (represented by: M. Graf, lawyer)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Caisse régionale de crédit agricole mutuel Pyrénées Gascogne (Serres-Castet, France)

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 31 January 2013 in Case R 775/2012-1;

    order the defendant to pay the costs of the procedure.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    Applicant for a Community trade mark: Square, Inc.

    Community trade mark concerned: The international registration designating the European Union of the word mark SQUARE for goods and services in Classes 9, 35 and 38 — international trade mark designating the European Union No W 1 032 395

    Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Caisse régionale de crédit agricole mutuel Pyrénées Gascogne

    Mark or sign cited in opposition: National word mark SQUARE-énergie for goods and services in Classes 31, 35, 36, 38, 41, 42 and 44

    Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld

    Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

    Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009


    Top