Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62013TN0053

    Case T-53/13: Action brought on 31 January 2013 — Vans/OHIM (Line which slants and curves)

    OJ C 101, 6.4.2013, p. 22–22 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    31/01/2013
    Date lodged:
    31/01/2013
    Author:
    General Court
    Form:
    Judicial information
    Authentic language:
    English
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Instruments cited in case law:
    Link

    6.4.2013   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 101/22

    Action brought on 31 January 2013 — Vans/OHIM (Line which slants and curves)

    (Case T-53/13)

    2013/C 101/47

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Vans, Inc. (Cypress, United Sates) (represented by: M. Hirsch, lawyer)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    Annul the contested decision in its entirety;

    —

    Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceeding.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark containing a device of a line which slants and curves for goods in classes 18 and 25 — Community trade mark application No 10 263 838

    Decision of the Examiner: Rejected the CTM application

    Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

    Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and 7(3) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.

    Top