This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013CN0525
Case C-525/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie van België (Belgium) lodged on 3 October 2013 — Vlaams Gewest v Heidi Van Den Broeck
Case C-525/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie van België (Belgium) lodged on 3 October 2013 — Vlaams Gewest v Heidi Van Den Broeck
Case C-525/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie van België (Belgium) lodged on 3 October 2013 — Vlaams Gewest v Heidi Van Den Broeck
OJ C 377, 21.12.2013, p. 6–6
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 03/10/2013
- Date lodged:
- 03/10/2013
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- Dutch
- Type of procedure:
- Reference for a preliminary ruling
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- request for interpretation 31992R3508 article 1 P1
- request for interpretation 32001R2419 article 33 P1
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
21.12.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 377/6 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie van België (Belgium) lodged on 3 October 2013 — Vlaams Gewest v Heidi Van Den Broeck
(Case C-525/13)
2013/C 377/12
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Hof van Cassatie van België
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: Vlaams Gewest
Respondent: Heidi Van Den Broeck
Question referred
Must the first paragraph of Article 33 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2419/2001 (1) of 11 December 2001 laying down detailed rules for applying the integrated administration and control system for certain Community aid schemes established by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3508/92 be interpreted as meaning that the refusal, for the calendar year in question, to grant ‘the aid to which the farmer would have been entitled pursuant to Article 31(2) … under the aid scheme concerned’, refers to the aid payable in implementation of ‘the aid scheme concerned’, as referred to in Article 1(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3508/92 (2) of 27 November 1992 establishing an integrated administration and control system for certain Community aid schemes, so that it is not only the aid for the ‘crop group concerned’ which must be refused, but the entire aid payable in implementation of one of the aid schemes referred to in that provision, of which the crop group concerned forms part?
