Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62013CN0408

    Case C-408/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Karlsruhe (Germany) lodged on 18 July 2013 — Barbara Huber v Manfred Huber

    OJ C 274, 21.9.2013, p. 15–15 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
    OJ C 274, 21.9.2013, p. 10–11 (HR)

    21.9.2013   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 274/15


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Karlsruhe (Germany) lodged on 18 July 2013 — Barbara Huber v Manfred Huber

    (Case C-408/13)

    2013/C 274/26

    Language of the case: German

    Referring court

    Amtsgericht Karlsruhe

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Barbara Huber

    Defendant: Manfred Huber

    Question referred

    Whether it is compatible with Article 3(a) and (b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 of 18 December 2008 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and cooperation in matters relating to maintenance obligations, (1)

    if it is provided in the first sentence of Paragraph 28(1) of the Gesetzes zur Geltendmachung von Unterhaltsansprüchen im Verkehr mit ausländischen Staaten (Auslandsunterhaltsgesetz — AUG),

    that, if a party concerned does not have his or her habitual residence in Germany, the court which is to rule exclusively on applications in maintenance cases falling under Article 3(a) and (b) of Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 is the Local Court which has jurisdiction for the seat of the Higher Regional Court in whose area of jurisdiction the defendant or creditor has his or her habitual residence?


    (1)  OJ 2009 L 7, p. 1.


    Top