Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62013CN0332

    Case C-332/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria (Hungary) lodged on 19 June 2013 — Ferenc Weigl v Nemzeti Innovációs Hivatal

    OJ C 274, 21.9.2013, p. 3–3 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
    OJ C 274, 21.9.2013, p. 2–2 (HR)

    Date of document:
    19/06/2013
    Date lodged:
    19/06/2013
    Author:
    Court of Justice
    Form:
    Judicial information
    Authentic language:
    Hungarian
    Type of procedure:
    Reference for a preliminary ruling
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Case affecting:
    Link

    21.9.2013   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 274/3

    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria (Hungary) lodged on 19 June 2013 — Ferenc Weigl v Nemzeti Innovációs Hivatal

    (Case C-332/13)

    2013/C 274/05

    Language of the case: Hungarian

    Referring court

    Kúria

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Ferenc Weigl

    Defendant: Nemzeti Innovációs Hivatal

    Questions referred

    1.

    Must the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union be considered applicable to the legal status of government officials and public officials?

    2.

    Must Article 30 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union be interpreted as meaning that the provision thereof concerning protection against unjustified termination of employment must be applied regardless of whether or not the Member State recognises Article 24 of the Revised European Social Charter as being binding upon it?

    3.

    If that is the case, must Article 30 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union be interpreted as meaning that a national provision under which, when the employment of a government official is terminated, it is not necessary to disclose to him the reasons for termination, corresponds to the concept of ‘unjustified dismissal’?

    4.

    Is it appropriate to interpret the expression ‘in accordance with Union law and national laws and practices’ contained in Article 30 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union as meaning that the Member State may define by legislation a special category of persons to whom it is not necessary to apply Article 30 of the Charter if their legal relationship is brought to an end?

    5.

    Having regard to the answer to questions 2 to 4, is it appropriate to interpret Article 51(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union as meaning, with regard to government officials, that the national courts must disapply national provisions that are contrary to Article 30 of that Charter?
    Top