Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62012TN0218

    Case T-218/12: Action brought on 22 May 2012 — Micrus Endovascular v OHIM — Laboratorios Delta (DELTA)

    OJ C 217, 21.7.2012, p. 26–26 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    21.7.2012   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 217/26


    Action brought on 22 May 2012 — Micrus Endovascular v OHIM — Laboratorios Delta (DELTA)

    (Case T-218/12)

    2012/C 217/55

    Language in which the application was lodged: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Micrus Endovascular LLC (Wilmington, United States) (represented by: B. Brandreth, Barrister)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Laboratorios Delta Lda (Queluz, Portugal)

    Form of order sought

    Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 6 March 2012 in case R 244/2011-2; and

    Order that the respondent pays the applicant its costs incurred before the Board of Appeal and the General Court.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

    Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘DELTA’, for goods in class 10 — Community trade mark application No 6655906

    Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

    Mark or sign cited in opposition: International trade mark registration No 131374 of the figurative mark ‘DELTA PORTUGAL’, for goods in class 5; Portuguese trade mark registration No 140578 of the figurative mark ‘DELTA PORTUGAL’, for goods in class 5; Registered trade name No 23113 ‘LABORATORIOS DELTA’

    Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition

    Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

    Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.


    Top