EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011TB0243
Case T-243/11: Order of the General Court of 9 November 2011 — Glaxo Group v OHIM — Farmodiética (ADVANCE) (Community trade mark — Applicant represented by a lawyer who is a not a third person — Inadmissibility)
Case T-243/11: Order of the General Court of 9 November 2011 — Glaxo Group v OHIM — Farmodiética (ADVANCE) (Community trade mark — Applicant represented by a lawyer who is a not a third person — Inadmissibility)
Case T-243/11: Order of the General Court of 9 November 2011 — Glaxo Group v OHIM — Farmodiética (ADVANCE) (Community trade mark — Applicant represented by a lawyer who is a not a third person — Inadmissibility)
OJ C 6, 7.1.2012, p. 17–17
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 09/11/2011
- Date lodged:
- 26/04/2011
- Author:
- General Court
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- English
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
7.1.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 6/17 |
Order of the General Court of 9 November 2011 — Glaxo Group v OHIM — Farmodiética (ADVANCE)
(Case T-243/11) (1)
(Community trade mark - Applicant represented by a lawyer who is a not a third person - Inadmissibility)
2012/C 6/32
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Glaxo Group Ltd (Greenford, United Kingdom) (represented by: O. Benito and C. Mansell, Solicitors)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Farmodiética — Cosmética, Dietética e Produtos Farmacêuticos, Lda (Estarda de S. Marcos, Portugal)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 February 2011 (Case R 665/2010-4), concerning opposition proceedings between Farmodiética — Cosmética, Dietética e Produtos Farmacêuticos, Lda and Glaxo Group Ltd.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
|
2. |
Glaxo Group Ltd shall pay the costs. |
