Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62010TO0211

    Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 July 2010.
    Strålfors AB v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
    Action for annulment - Application initiating proceedings - Formal requirements - Manifest inadmissibility.
    Case T-211/10.

    European Court Reports 2010 II-00143*

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2010:301





    Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 July 2010 – Strålfors v OHIM (ID SOLUTIONS)

    (Case T-211/10)

    Action for annulment – Application initiating proceedings – Formal requirements – Manifest inadmissibility

    Procedure – Application initiating proceedings – Formal requirements – Brief summary of the pleas in law on which the application is based – Pleas in law not set out in the application – Reference to the whole of the annexes – Inadmissibility (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 21, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 44(1)(c)) (see paras 5-7)

    Re:

    ACTION against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 January 2010 (Case R 1111/2009-2), concerning an application for registration of word sign ID SOLUTIONS as a Community trade mark.

    Information relating to the case

    Applicant for the Community trade mark:

    Strålfors AB

    Community trade mark sought:

    Word mark ID SOLUTIONS for goods in Class 16 – Community trade mark application No – 8235202

    Decision of the examiner:

    Registration partially refused

    Decision of the Board of Appeal:

    Dismissal of the appeal and confirmation of the contested decision


    Operative part

    1.      The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

    2.      Strålfors AB is ordered to bear its own costs.

    Top