This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010TO0211
Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 July 2010. # Strålfors AB v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). # Action for annulment - Application initiating proceedings - Formal requirements - Manifest inadmissibility. # Case T-211/10.
Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 July 2010.
Strålfors AB v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Action for annulment - Application initiating proceedings - Formal requirements - Manifest inadmissibility.
Case T-211/10.
Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 July 2010.
Strålfors AB v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Action for annulment - Application initiating proceedings - Formal requirements - Manifest inadmissibility.
Case T-211/10.
European Court Reports 2010 II-00143*
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2010:301
Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 July 2010 – Strålfors v OHIM (ID SOLUTIONS)
(Case T-211/10)
Action for annulment – Application initiating proceedings – Formal requirements – Manifest inadmissibility
Procedure – Application initiating proceedings – Formal requirements – Brief summary of the pleas in law on which the application is based – Pleas in law not set out in the application – Reference to the whole of the annexes – Inadmissibility (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 21, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 44(1)(c)) (see paras 5-7)
Re:
ACTION against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 January 2010 (Case R 1111/2009-2), concerning an application for registration of word sign ID SOLUTIONS as a Community trade mark. |
Information relating to the case
Applicant for the Community trade mark: |
Strålfors AB |
Community trade mark sought: |
Word mark ID SOLUTIONS for goods in Class 16 – Community trade mark application No – 8235202 |
Decision of the examiner: |
Registration partially refused |
Decision of the Board of Appeal: |
Dismissal of the appeal and confirmation of the contested decision |
Operative part
1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2. Strålfors AB is ordered to bear its own costs.