This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010TJ0241
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 27 February 2013.#Republic of Poland v European Commission.#EAGGF, EAGF and EAFRD — ‘Guarantee’ Section — Expenditure excluded from financing — Direct payments — Identification system for agricultural parcels — Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 — Lack of effectiveness and reliability — Intentional irregularities — Article 53 of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004.#Case T‑241/10.
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 27 February 2013.
Republic of Poland v European Commission.
EAGGF, EAGF and EAFRD — ‘Guarantee’ Section — Expenditure excluded from financing — Direct payments — Identification system for agricultural parcels — Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 — Lack of effectiveness and reliability — Intentional irregularities — Article 53 of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004.
Case T‑241/10.
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 27 February 2013.
Republic of Poland v European Commission.
EAGGF, EAGF and EAFRD — ‘Guarantee’ Section — Expenditure excluded from financing — Direct payments — Identification system for agricultural parcels — Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 — Lack of effectiveness and reliability — Intentional irregularities — Article 53 of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004.
Case T‑241/10.
European Court Reports 2013 -00000
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2013:96
- Date of document:
- 27/02/2013
- Date lodged:
- 24/05/2010
- Author:
- General Court
- Country or organisation from which the request originates:
- Poland
- Form:
- Judgment
- Additional information:
- POURVOI C-273/13 P
- Authentic language:
- Polish
- Type of procedure:
- Action for annulment - unfounded
- Applicant:
- EU Member States, Poland
- Defendant:
- EU institutions and bodies, European Commission
- Judge-Rapporteur:
- Schwarcz
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Confirms 32010D0152
- Affected by case:
-
- Confirmed by 62013CJ0273
- Instruments cited in case law:
-
- 12008E296: N 109
- 12008M006-P3: N 90
- 31991Q0530-A44P1L3: N 103 150
- 31995R2988: N 84
- 31999R1258-A07P4: N 84
- 32003R1782-A143TERP4: N 112 - 114 117 124
- 32003R1782-A143TERP5: N 113 - 114 124
- 32003R1782-A05: N 116
- 32003R1782-A143TERP4L1: N 116
- 32003R1782-A18: N 32
- 32003R1782-C13: N 32
- 32004R0796-A02: N 115
- 32004R0796-A02P1: N 117
- 32004R0796-A02P2: N 117
- 32004R0796-A26: N 127
- 32004R0796-A26P1: N 132
- 32004R0796-A26P3: N 132
- 32004R0796-A24: N 26
- 32004R0796-A06P2: N 47 55 - 57
- 32004R0796-A53: N 73 76 - 77 79 - 80 83 85 - 98
- 32004R0796-A50P3: N 80
- 32004R0796-A73: N 96
- 32004R1973-A138P1: N 83
- 32005R1290-A31P1: N 83
- 32005R1290-A31P2: N 83
- 32006R1782-A20: N 25 31 33 35 38 40 - 43 47
- 32010D0152: N 19 92 109 111 137 146 171 175
- 61982CJ0205: N 81 - 82 86
- 61988CJ0008: N 21 - 22
- 61996CJ0238: N 139 - 140
- 61998CJ0247: N 23
- 61998CJ0263-N37: N 138 160
- 61998CJ0278: N 23
- 61999CJ0130: N 110
- 62002CJ0300: N 20 23
- 62003CJ0005: N 138 - 139 160
- 62003CJ0307: N 81 - 82 86
- 62003CJ0335: N 110
- 62005CJ0162: N 91
- 62005TJ0368: N 22 109 120
- 62006CJ0418: N 22
- 62006TJ0183: N 21
- 62009CJ0061: N 117
- 62009TJ0469: N 102 150
- 62010CJ0489: N 83 - 84 86 88
- 62010TJ0106: N 143
- Subject matter:
- Case law directory code:
-
