Case C-337/09 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 July 2012 — Council of the European Union v Zhejiang Xinan Chemical Industrial Group Co. Ltd, European Commission, Association des utilisateurs et distributeurs de l’agrochimie européenne (Audace) (Appeal — Commercial policy — Dumping — Imports of glyphosate originating in China — Regulation (EC) No 384/96 — Article 2(7)(b) and (c) — Status of an undertaking operating under market economy conditions — Concept of ‘significant State interference’ within the meaning of the first indent of Article 2(7)(c) — State shareholder controlling de facto the general meeting of the producer’s shareholders — Equating such control to ‘significant interference’ — Assessment of an export contract stamping mechanism — Limits of judicial review — Assessment of the evidence submitted)

Case C-337/09 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 July 2012 — Council of the European Union v Zhejiang Xinan Chemical Industrial Group Co. Ltd, European Commission, Association des utilisateurs et distributeurs de l’agrochimie européenne (Audace) (Appeal — Commercial policy — Dumping — Imports of glyphosate originating in China — Regulation (EC) No 384/96 — Article 2(7)(b) and (c) — Status of an undertaking operating under market economy conditions — Concept of ‘significant State interference’ within the meaning of the first indent of Article 2(7)(c) — State shareholder controlling de facto the general meeting of the producer’s shareholders — Equating such control to ‘significant interference’ — Assessment of an export contract stamping mechanism — Limits of judicial review — Assessment of the evidence submitted)

Case C-337/09 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 July 2012 — Council of the European Union v Zhejiang Xinan Chemical Industrial Group Co. Ltd, European Commission, Association des utilisateurs et distributeurs de l’agrochimie européenne (Audace) (Appeal — Commercial policy — Dumping — Imports of glyphosate originating in China — Regulation (EC) No 384/96 — Article 2(7)(b) and (c) — Status of an undertaking operating under market economy conditions — Concept of ‘significant State interference’ within the meaning of the first indent of Article 2(7)(c) — State shareholder controlling de facto the general meeting of the producer’s shareholders — Equating such control to ‘significant interference’ — Assessment of an export contract stamping mechanism — Limits of judicial review — Assessment of the evidence submitted)

OJ C 295, 29.9.2012, p. 2–2 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)