Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62008TN0395

    Case T-395/08: Action brought on 22 September 2008 — Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli v OHIM (Shape of a chocolate rabbit)

    OJ C 313, 6.12.2008, p. 37–37 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    22/09/2008
    Date lodged:
    22/09/2008
    Author:
    Court of First Instance
    Form:
    Judicial information
    Authentic language:
    German

    6.12.2008   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 313/37

    Action brought on 22 September 2008 — Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli v OHIM (Shape of a chocolate rabbit)

    (Case T-395/08)

    (2008/C 313/68)

    Language in which the application was lodged: German

    Parties

    Applicant: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG (Kilchberg, Switzerland) (represented by R. Lange, E. Schalast and G. Hild, lawyers)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    Form of order sought

    —

    annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 18 July 2008 (Case No R 419/2008-4);

    —

    order the defendant to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    Community trade mark concerned: the three-dimensional mark in the form of a chocolate rabbit for goods in Class 30 — Application No 3 664 372

    Decision of the Examiner: Rejection of the application

    Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

    Pleas in law: The mark applied for is unusual, has the function of indicating origin and has the necessary distinctive character.

    Top