Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62008TJ0387

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2010.
Evropaïki Dynamiki - Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Commission.
Public service contracts - Publications Office's tendering procedure - Provision of computing services - Rejection of a tenderer's bid - Action for annulment - Award criteria and sub-criteria - Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based - Equal treatment - Transparency - Manifest error of assessment - Misuse of powers - Claim for damages.
Case T-387/08.

European Court Reports 2010 II-00178*

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2010:377





Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2010 – Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commmission

(Case T-387/08)

Public service contracts – Publications Office’s tendering procedure – Provision of computing services – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid – Action for annulment – Award criteria and sub-criteria – Duty to state reasons – Equal treatment – Transparency – Manifest error of assessment – Misuse of powers – Claim for damages

1.                     European Communities’ public procurement – Conclusion of a contract following a call for tenders – Discretion of the institutions – Judicial review – Limits (see paras 30, 77)

2.                     Acts of the institutions – Statement of reasons – Obligation – Scope (Art. 253 EC; Council Regulation No 1605/2002, Art. 100(2); Comission Regulation No 2342/2002, Art. 149(3)) (see paras 31-38, 58-60, 63-67)

Re:

APPLICATION (i) for annulment of the decision of the Publications Office of the European Union of 20 June 2008 rejecting the tender submitted by the applicant in Call for Tender AO 10185 for computing services – maintenance of the SEI‑BUD/AMD/CR systems and related services and of the decision to award the contract to another tenderer, and (ii) for damages.

Operative part

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the action;

2.

Orders Evropaïki Dynamiki – Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to bear 90% of its own costs and to pay 90% of the costs incurred by the European Commission, and the latter to bear 10% of its own costs and to pay 10% of the costs incurred by Evropaïki Dynamiki – Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE.

Top