This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62007TA0459
Case T-459/07: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 July 2013 — Hangzhou Duralamp Electronics v Council (Dumping — Imports of integrated electronic compact fluorescent lamps (CFL-i) originating in China, Vietnam, Pakistan and the Philippines — Expiry of anti-dumping measures — Review — Like product — Data used to determine the injury — Analogue country — Community interest — Article 4(1) and Article 5(4) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (now Article 4(1) and Article 5(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009) — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence)
Case T-459/07: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 July 2013 — Hangzhou Duralamp Electronics v Council (Dumping — Imports of integrated electronic compact fluorescent lamps (CFL-i) originating in China, Vietnam, Pakistan and the Philippines — Expiry of anti-dumping measures — Review — Like product — Data used to determine the injury — Analogue country — Community interest — Article 4(1) and Article 5(4) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (now Article 4(1) and Article 5(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009) — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence)
Case T-459/07: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 July 2013 — Hangzhou Duralamp Electronics v Council (Dumping — Imports of integrated electronic compact fluorescent lamps (CFL-i) originating in China, Vietnam, Pakistan and the Philippines — Expiry of anti-dumping measures — Review — Like product — Data used to determine the injury — Analogue country — Community interest — Article 4(1) and Article 5(4) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (now Article 4(1) and Article 5(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009) — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence)
Information about publishing Official Journal not found, p. 28–28
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
Information about publishing Official Journal not found, p. 19–19
(HR)
- Date of document:
- 11/07/2013
- Date lodged:
- 17/12/2007
- Author:
- General Court
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- English
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Annulment request 32007R1205
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
|
31.8.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 252/28 |
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 July 2013 — Hangzhou Duralamp Electronics v Council
(Case T-459/07) (1)
(Dumping - Imports of integrated electronic compact fluorescent lamps (CFL-i) originating in China, Vietnam, Pakistan and the Philippines - Expiry of anti-dumping measures - Review - Like product - Data used to determine the injury - Analogue country - Community interest - Article 4(1) and Article 5(4) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (now Article 4(1) and Article 5(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009) - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of the defence)
2013/C 252/43
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Hangzhou Duralamp Electronics Co., Ltd (Hangzhou, China) (represented by: M. Gambardella and V. Villante, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: initially by J.-P. Hix, and subsequently by J.-P. Hix and B. Driessen, acting as Agents, and by G. Berrisch and G. Wolf, and subsequently G. Berrisch, lawyers)
Interveners in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. van Vliet and K. Talabér-Ritz, Agents); and by Osram GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: R. Bierwagen, lawyer)
Re:
Application for annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 1205/2007 of 15 October 2007 imposing anti-dumping duties on imports of integrated electronic compact fluorescent lamps (CFL-i) originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 and extending to imports of the same product consigned from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, the Islamic Republic of Pakistan and the Republic of the Philippines (OJ 2007 L 272, p. 1)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Hangzhou Duralamp Electronics Co., Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union and by Osram GmbH; |
|
3. |
Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
