Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62007CJ0543

    Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 July 2008.
    Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium.
    Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2002/73/EC - Equal treatment for men and women - Access to employment - Vocational training and promotion - Working conditions - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period.
    Case C-543/07.

    European Court Reports 2008 I-00116*

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2008:436

    Date of document:
    17/07/2008
    Date lodged:
    03/12/2007
    Author:
    Court of Justice
    Country or organisation from which the request originates:
    Belgium
    Form:
    Judgment
    Authentic language:
    Dutch
    Type of procedure:
    Action for failure to fulfil obligations - successful
    Defendant:
    Belgium
    Judge-Rapporteur:
    Malenovský
    Advocate General:
    Mazák
    Treaty:
    Treaty establishing the European Economic Community
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Case affecting:
    Instruments cited in case law:





    Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 July 2008 – Commission v Belgium

    (Case C‑543/07)

    Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 2002/73/EC – Equal treatment for men and women – Access to employment – Vocational training and promotion – Working conditions – Failure to transpose within the prescribed period

    1.                     Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Examination of the merits by the Court – Situation to be taken into consideration – Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (Art. 226 EC) (see para. 9)

    2.                     Member States – Obligations – Implementation of directives – Failure to fulfil obligations – National system pleaded as justification – Not permissible (Art. 226 EC) (see para. 11)

    Re:

    Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, the provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/73/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 amending Council Directive 76/207/EEC on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions (OJ 2002 L 296, p. 15).

    Operative part

    The Court:

    1.

    Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/73/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 amending Council Directive 76/207/EEC on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

    2.

    Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

    Top