This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62006FA0074
Case F-74/06: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 24 April 2008 — Longinidis v Cedefop (Staff case — Members of the temporary staff — Reassignment — Appeals Committee — Composition and internal rules of procedure — Unfair behaviour — Dismissal — Statement of reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Misuse of powers)
Case F-74/06: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 24 April 2008 — Longinidis v Cedefop (Staff case — Members of the temporary staff — Reassignment — Appeals Committee — Composition and internal rules of procedure — Unfair behaviour — Dismissal — Statement of reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Misuse of powers)
Case F-74/06: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 24 April 2008 — Longinidis v Cedefop (Staff case — Members of the temporary staff — Reassignment — Appeals Committee — Composition and internal rules of procedure — Unfair behaviour — Dismissal — Statement of reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Misuse of powers)
OJ C 209, 15.8.2008, p. 70–70
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
15.8.2008 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 209/70 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 24 April 2008 — Longinidis v Cedefop
(Case F-74/06) (1)
(Staff case - Members of the temporary staff - Reassignment - Appeals Committee - Composition and internal rules of procedure - Unfair behaviour - Dismissal - Statement of reasons - Manifest error of assessment - Misuse of powers)
(2008/C 209/127)
Language of the case: Greek
Parties
Applicant: Pavlos Longinidis (Panorama, Greece) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis and N. Keramidas, lawyers)
Defendant: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) (represented by: M. Fuchs, Agent, and P. Anestis, lawyer)
Re:
First, annulment of the decision of the Directorate of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) of 30 November 2005 terminating the applicant's indefinite term contract along with a series of decisions concerning inter alia Cedefop's Appeals Committee and, second, a claim for damages.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
1. |
Dismisses the action as partly inadmissible and partly unfounded; |
2. |
Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
(1) OJ C 237, 30.9.2006, p. 15.