13.12.2013   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 365/1

1.

The Agency for Cooperation of Energy Regulators (hereinafter ‘the Agency’, aka ‘ACER’), which is located in Ljublana, was created by Regulation (EC) No 713/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1). The Agency’s main task is to assist National Regulatory Authorities in exercising, at Union level, the regulatory tasks that they perform in the Member States and, where necessary, to coordinate their action. Under the REMIT regulation (2), the Agency was given new additional responsibilities, together with national regulatory authorities, regarding the monitoring of the European wholesale energy market (3).

2.

The audit approach taken by the Court comprises analytical audit procedures, direct testing of transactions and an assessment of key controls of the Agency’s supervisory and control systems. This is supplemented by evidence provided by the work of other auditors (where relevant) and an analysis of management representations.

3.

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the Court has audited:

4.

In accordance with Articles 33 and 43 of Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 (6), the management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the annual accounts of the Agency and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions:

5.

The Court’s responsibility is, on the basis of its audit, to provide the European Parliament and the Council (8) with a statement of assurance as to the reliability of the annual accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions. The Court conducts its audit in accordance with the IFAC International Standards on Auditing and Codes of Ethics and the INTOSAI International Standards of Supreme Audit Institutions. These standards require the Court to plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance as to whether the annual accounts of the Agency are free from material misstatement and the transactions underlying them are legal and regular.

6.

The audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgement, which is based on an assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the accounts and material non-compliance by the underlying transactions with the requirements in the legal framework of the European Union, whether due to fraud or error. In assessing these risks, the auditor considers any internal controls relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of the accounts, as well as the supervisory and control systems that are implemented to ensure the legality and regularity of underlying transactions, and designs audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. The audit also entails evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies, the reasonableness of accounting estimates and the overall presentation of the accounts.

7.

The Court considers that the audit evidence obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for its statement of assurance.

8.

In the Court’s opinion, the Agency’s annual accounts present fairly, in all material respects, its financial position as at 31 December 2012 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of its Financial Regulation and the accounting rules adopted by the Commission’s accounting officer.

9.

In the Court’s opinion, the transactions underlying the annual accounts for the year ended 31 December 2012 are legal and regular in all material respects.

10.

The comments which follow do not call the Court’s opinions into question.

11.

In order to cover higher school fees, the Agency grants staff whose children attend primary or secondary school a top up allowance in addition to the education allowances provided for in the Staff Regulations (9). Total 2012 top up allowances amounted to some 23 000 euro. They are not covered by the Staff Regulations and are therefore irregular.

12.

The Agency carried over committed appropriations under title II (Agency’s building and associated costs) of its budget amounting to 1,7 million euro, representing 81 % of total committed title II appropriations. These carry-overs mainly relate to the implementation of the REMIT regulation which is ongoing. Since the implementation is linked to the Agency’s operational activities, it should normally have been budgeted under title III.

13.

In 2012, the Agency made 20 budget transfers of some 1 million euro and affecting 43 budget lines. This indicates weaknesses in budget planning.

14.

The Agency held 4,2 million euro in cash at the year end, including the 2011 budget surplus of 1,6 million euro which resulted from an excessive call for funds in 2011 and was recovered by the Commission in January 2013. This is not consistent with a rigorous treasury management.

15.

The audited recruitment procedures revealed shortcomings affecting transparency and an equal treatment of candidates: questions for interviews and tests were not set before the examination of the applications. The conditions for admission to written tests and interviews and for being included in the list of suitable candidates were not specified in sufficient detail and the measures taken to ensure the anonymity of candidates sitting written tests were inadequate.

16.

An overview of the corrective actions taken in response to the Court’s previous year’s comments is provided in Annex I.