Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62021CO0547

    Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 13 December 2021.
    Portuguese Republic v European Commission.
    Appeal – Interim relief – State aid – Madeira Free Zone (Portugal) – Granting of tax advantages to companies – State aid scheme implemented by the Portuguese Republic – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market – Urgency – Serious and irreparable harm.
    Case C-547/21 P(R).

    Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2021:1007

     Order of the Vice-president of the Court of Justice of 13 December 2021 – Portugal v Commission

    (Case C‑547/21 P(R))

    (Appeal – Interim relief – State aid – Madeira Free Zone (Portugal) – Granting of tax advantages to companies – State aid scheme implemented by the Portuguese Republic – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market – Urgency – Serious and irreparable harm)

    1. 

    Interim relief – Suspension of operation of a measure – Interim measures – Conditions for granting – Urgency – Serious and irreparable harm – Harm that can be pleaded by a Member State

    (Arts 278 and 279 TFEU)

    (see paras 22, 23)

    2. 

    Appeals – Grounds – Inadequate statement of reasons – Application in the case of interim orders

    (see para. 76)

    3. 

    Interim relief – Suspension of operation of a measure – Interim measures – Conditions for granting – Urgency – Serious and irreparable harm – Burden of proof – Damage foreseeable with a reasonable degree of probability

    (Arts 278 and 279 TFEU)

    (see paras 78-81)

    4. 

    Interim relief – Procedure – Measures of organisation of procedure – Request to hear witnesses – Discretion of the court hearing the application for interim relief

    (Arts 278 and 279 TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 157)

    (see paras 82-84)

    5. 

    Appeals – Grounds – Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence – Inadmissibility – Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence – Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted – Ground of appeal alleging distortion of the clear sense of the evidence – Need to indicate precisely the evidence alleged to have been distorted and show the errors of appraisal which led to that distortion – Requirement that the distortion be obvious from the documents in the file

    (Art. 256 (1), 2d para., TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58 (1))

    (see paras 85-89, 92-94, 101)

    6. 

    Appeals – Grounds – Plea alleging failure to sign an order by the President of the General Court and by the Registrar – Specific measures of organisation implemented within the General Court to ensure the continuity of its operation in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic

    (Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 120)

    (see paras 115-118)

    Operative part

    1. 

    The appeal is dismissed.

    2. 

    The Portuguese Republic shall pay the cost.

    Top