This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 52012SC0112
JOINT STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in 2011 Regional Report : Eastern Partnership Accompanying the document JOINT COMMUNICATION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS Delivering on a new European Neighbourhood Policy
JOINT STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in 2011 Regional Report : Eastern Partnership Accompanying the document JOINT COMMUNICATION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS Delivering on a new European Neighbourhood Policy
JOINT STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in 2011 Regional Report : Eastern Partnership Accompanying the document JOINT COMMUNICATION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS Delivering on a new European Neighbourhood Policy
/* SWD/2012/0112 final */
JOINT STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in 2011 Regional Report : Eastern Partnership Accompanying the document JOINT COMMUNICATION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS Delivering on a new European Neighbourhood Policy /* SWD/2012/0112 final */
1.
Introduction
In 2011 the Eastern Partnership (EaP)
consolidated and advanced steadily on both bilateral and multilateral tracks.
However, despite many achievements, the limited progress and, in some
countries, regression in democracy, the rule of law and human rights remains a
challenge which must be faced in the years ahead. 2011 saw increased engagement on the part
of stakeholders whose support is crucial if the ambitious goals of the
Partnership are to be achieved. On 3 May 2011, the EaP was given a
parliamentary dimension, with the establishment of the Euronest Parliamentary
Assembly (PA). On 8 September 2011, the Conference of Regional and Local
Authorities of the EaP (CORLEAP) met for the first time and laid the
foundations for a regional dimension of the EaP. To involve economic operators
in implementation of the Partnership on more regular basis, the first EaP
Business Forum was organised on 30 September 2011. These new strands of
cooperation have complemented the thriving EaP Civil Society Forum (CSF), which
involves civil society organisations from Eastern European countries and the
EU. In all six EaP countries, CSF national platforms have been established,
providing civil society organisations with a chance to engage in implementation
of the EaP at country level. A Joint Communication of the High
Representative (HR) and the European Commission ‘A New Response to a Changing
Neighbourhood’ of 25 May 2011 gave additional momentum to development of the
EaP. Key elements of the revised Neighbourhood policy were implemented by the
second EaP Summit in Warsaw (29-30 September 2011). The Warsaw Summit
reiterated that the main goal of the EaP is to support Eastern European
countries’ reform processes with a view to accelerating their political
association and economic integration with the European Union (EU). The Summit acknowledged the European aspirations of some partners. The participants also agreed
that, as proposed in the May Communication, greater differentiation and mutual
accountability will be applied more systematically to implementation of the
EaP. The pace of reforms will determine the intensity of the cooperation and
partners most engaged in reforms will benefit more from their relationship with
the EU, including in the form of increased EU support. The participants agreed
that economic integration remains the centrepiece of the Partnership. However,
economic reforms will not be sustainable without political ones - hence the
emphasis on shared values of democracy, human rights and the rule of law. In
this context, the involvement of civil society is indispensable if ambitious
reforms are to succeed. Therefore, support for civil society has been
considerably increased with the establishment of a Neighbourhood Civil Society
Facility in September 2011. At the same time, a ’European Endowment for
Democracy’ will, once established, allow the EU to provide additional support
for those who are engaged in democratic causes in the region. The Summit also highlighted the importance of enhanced mobility of citizens as a key objective
of the Partnership and agreed that visa-free regimes - on a case-by-case basis
- are the final goal of the cooperation in this area. 2011 brought substantial progress on the
bilateral track of the EaP. Negotiations on the Association Agreement (AA)
including the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA) with Ukraine were finalised. Progress was made in the preparation for the launching of
negotiations on a DCFTA with the Republic of Moldova, Georgia and Armenia, as an integral part of the ongoing AA negotiations. This led to the decision,
in December 2011, to launch negotiations with the Republic of Moldova and Georgia andin February 2012 the decision was taken for Armenia. Progress was also made on mobility of
citizens. Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova pursued the implementation of
their respective Action Plans on visa liberalisation. The second progress
reports on the implementation of the Action Plan on Visa Liberalisation were
presented in February 2012. While implementation of the existing Facilitation
and Readmission Agreements between the EU and Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova continued in 2011, negotiations on amendments to those Agreements were
concluded in December 2011 and January 2012 respectively. The Commission
launched negotiations of Visa Facilitation and Readmission Agreements with Armenia and Azerbaijan in March 2012, following the adoption by the Council of negotiating
directives in December 2011. Visa Facilitation and Readmission agreements with Georgia entered into force in March 2011. Such agreements have so far been implemented
effectively. A visa liberalisation dialogue with Georgia might start soon.
Mobility was also facilitated through the implementation of the EU Visa Code.
In October 2011 Armenia and the EU launched a Mobility Partnership. It is the
third EU Mobility Partnership with an Eastern Partnership country following the
ones signed with the Republic of Moldova and Georgia in 2008 and 2009
respectively. Mobility Partnerships are innovative and comprehensive tools to
foster cooperation on migration and mobility issues, including legal migration,
the fight against irregular migration, international protection, and migration
and development. Bilateral cooperation was also strengthened
by dedicated human rights dialogue meetings with Eastern partners, in addition to and complementing the regular
political dialogue meetings. Throughout 2011, the EU pursued a policy of
critical engagement towards Belarus. Following the crackdown on civil society
and the opposition after the December 2010 Presidential elections, the EU
significantly increased its support to civil society. In parallel, it also
imposed a number of restrictive measures on Belarus. In June 2011 the EU
proposed to Belarus the launch of negotiations on Visa Facilitation and
Readmission Agreements. The EU also prepared for the launch of a ‘European
dialogue on modernisation’ with Belarusian society on reforms necessary for
modernisation of the country and on the related potential development of its
relations with the EU. Belarus continued to participate in the multilateral
track of the EaP, including platforms and panels. The report which follows covers the
progress made with implementation of the EaP in 2011. It is an annex to the
Joint Communication of the High Representative and the Commission, XXX, and
should be read in conjunction with the country progress reports on Armenia,
Azerbaijan, Georgia, the Republic of Moldova and Ukraine, which describe in
more detail the progress made by the individual partners on implementing the
EaP.
2.
A deeper bilateral engagement
2.1.
Political association
Ø
Association Agreements (AAs) To prepare the ground for the political
association of partners with the EU, work towards deepening political relations
continued, with a key focus on negotiation of AAs. Such negotiations
were conducted with Ukraine, the Republic of Moldova, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia. Due to the political circumstances prevailing within the country, Belarus did not participate in the bilateral track of the Eastern Partnership during the
reporting period. Ukraine:
Four plenary meetings (the 18th to 21st
since the beginning of negotiations) plus five rounds of DCFTA negotiations
(bringing the total number of rounds to 18) were held alternately in Brussels and Kiev in 2011. Several technical contacts supplemented the talks throughout
the year. At the 15th EU-Ukraine Summit meeting on 19 December, EU
and Ukrainian leaders noted that the chief negotiators had reached a common
understanding on the full text of the AA. This paved the way for technical
completion of the final consolidated version of the document, including its
DCFTA part, with a view to initialling and, provided political conditions
permit, its signature and ratification. Republic
of Moldova: Very
good progress continued to be made on the AA negotiations. Four plenary
meetings (the 5th to 8th) were held in Brussels and Chisinau
alternately in 2011. In December the EU announced that the Republic of Moldova had made sufficient progress with implementation of the Commission’s key
recommendations to launch the DCFTA negotiations. The negotiations started in
February 2012. Armenia: Four plenary meetings (the 4th to 7th)
were held in Brussels and Yerevan alternately in 2011. Very good progress was
recorded under the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) and Justice,
Freedom and Security (JFS) titles where most of the text has been agreed. The
parties agreed to discuss a few specific paragraphs at a later stage. Excellent
progress was also recorded under the Sectoral Policies title (21 chapters
closed out of 28). In February 2012 the EU
announced that Armenia had made sufficient progress with implementation of the
Commission’s key recommendations to launch the DCFTA negotiations. Georgia: Four plenary meetings (the 4th
to 7th) were held in Brussels and Tbilisi alternately in 2011. In
November, the European Parliament (EP) adopted a resolution on these
negotiations. Very good progress was recorded under the CFSP and JFS titles
where most of the text has been agreed. The parties agreed to discuss a few
specific paragraphs at a later stage. Excellent progress was also recorded
under the Sectoral Policies title (20 chapters closed out of 28). At the end of
2011, the EU decided to start negotiations on a DCFTA (as an integral part of
the AA). The negotiations started in February
2012. Azerbaijan: Three plenary meetings (the 3rd to 5th)
were held in Brussels and Baku alternately in 2011 and all the topics of the AA
(including trade issues) were addressed. Good progress was recorded on Sectoral
Policies (13 chapters closed out of 28), Trade and JFS. Discussions on the CFSP
title proved more difficult and the parties agreed to hold additional sessions
on this topic. Ø
Strengthened human rights dialogues (HRD) The
commitment to the values of democracy, rule of law,
human rights and fundamental freedoms lies at the heart of the EaP. In 2011, further
steps were taken to strengthen bilateral dialogues on these matters. In April, the EU held
the second round of its HRD with the Republic of Moldova. In June, the fourth
round of the HRD with Georgia took place. The third meeting of the EU-Armenia
HRD followed in December. In May, for the first time, the EU and Ukraine held a discussion on human rights questions within the JFS Sub-committee. Issues
related to democracy and human rights were also discussed with Azerbaijan in the Sub-committee for JFS and Human Rights and Democracy in November. The HRD
were complemented by joint civil society seminars, allowing non-governmental organisations
and experts from both sides to have an in-depth discussion on human rights
issues and to make recommendations to the participants in the dialogues. In
2011, seminars of this kind took place in Azerbaijan, the Republic of Moldova and Armenia.
2.2.
Economic Integration
Ø
Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Areas
(DCFTAs) Except for Belarus, in 2011 the EU
continued negotiations with all EaP countries on AAs which will provide, inter
alia, the establishment of DCFTAs. In the cases of the Republic of Moldova, Georgia and Armenia, negotiations were subject to the precondition that
these countries fulfil a number of key recommendations. With Ukraine, negotiations on the DCFTA were finalised in December 2011 as an integral part
of the AA negotiations. Also in December 2011, the EU concluded that Georgia and the Republic of Moldova had made sufficient progress in
trade-related reforms required for the start of negotiations on a DCFTA and
took a decision to launch these negotiations. In 2011, Armenia made significant progress in the preparations for the DCFTA negotiations by advancing
with implementation of the necessary reforms, focusing on sanitary and
phytosanitary issues, technical barriers to trade and on intellectual property
rights. Following a recommendation from the Commission, in February 2012 the
Trade Policy Committee agreed that Armenia had made sufficient progress on
implementation of the Commission’s key recommendations and that negotiations on
a DCFTA could start soon. Ø
Macro-economic dialogues In 2011, macro-economic dialogues were conducted with the six
EaP countries. These allowed a frank exchange on economic developments and
policy challenges, including on the implications of the sovereign debt crisis
in the euro area for the EaP countries.
The dialogues provided an opportunity
to review implementation of the economic reform priorities identified in the
ENP Action Plans and the Association Agenda. They
took into account the ongoing EU macrofinancial assistance (MFA) programmes,
which help partner countries to address
short-term balance of payments difficulties. The Republic of Moldova’s MFA programme, about to be completed, offered €90 million in grant money, of which
€60 million had been disbursed by the end of the year. The Ukraine programme, now being prepared, involves €610 million in loans. Armenia has benefited from
€100 million in grants and loans, and Georgia’s €46 million is still awaiting
the legislative approval. The macro-economic dialogue with Belarus was the first of its kind and resulted in the joint
signature of conclusions committing the
Belarusian authorities to strengthen macro-economic stability and systemic
reform efforts.
2.3.
Mobility
As reiterated by the EaP Warsaw Summit in September, enhancing mobility
of citizens in a secure and
well-managed environment remains a guiding
principle of the EaP. This objective includes establishment of visa
free regimes in due course, on a case by case basis. Specific steps have
already been taken to make it easier, cheaper and
faster for Eastern neighbours to enter the EU, with visa facilitation
agreements as an intermediate step towards visa free travel. Implementation of
the Visa Facilitation and Readmission Agreements between the EU and Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova continued in 2011, and new
agreements with Georgia on the same subject entered into force in March
2011. The first two meetings of the EU-Georgia Joint
Committee in 2011 assessed implementation of the new agreements as smooth and
effective. Negotiations on amendments to the EU-Republic of Moldova and EU-Ukraine Visa Facilitation Agreements were finalised. Negotiations of Visa
Facilitation and Readmission Agreements with Armenia and Azerbaijan started in March 2012, following the approval of EU negotiating mandates in December
2011. In 2011, the EaP took a clear commitment to
strengthen cooperation in the area of JFS. In September, the Commission
put forward concrete proposals aiming at further enhancing the level of
political and operational cooperation towards establishment of a Common Justice
and Home Affairs (JHA) Space between the EU and its Eastern partners. For Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova in particular, the Visa Liberalisation Action Plans proved to be
key incentives for pushing forward reform in the JFS area. The reform of the judiciary and fight
against corruption in the EaP countries continued to be major concerns.
Progress was registered on migration, but establishment of modern and effective
systems for asylum and international protection are still to be addressed in
most EaP countries. Assessments of data protection legislation were launched
for the Republic of Moldova and Ukraine, which are currently negotiating
cooperation agreements with Europol and Eurojust. Renewed attention was given to the anti-drugs
policy, and new drugs dialogues were started in October with the Republic of Moldova, Armenia, Georgia and Azerbaijan. Cooperation with the European Monitoring
Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction progressed and all EaP partners took part
in the September 2011 Kiev TAIEX seminar on evidence-based drug policies and
data collection on treatment and drug-related infectious diseases. In order to
enhance regional police cooperation, preparations began for the launch of the
EuroEast Police project in early 2012.
Ø
Mobility Partnerships Mobility Partnerships (MP) are an innovative and comprehensive way to foster cooperation on
migration and mobility issues, including legal migration, the fight against
irregular migration, international protection, and migration and development.
Three of the four MPs signed so far concern the EaP region (Republic of Moldova, Georgia and Armenia). Ø
Action Plans on Visa Liberalisation Visa dialogues with Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova advanced substantially in 2011, based of the Action Plans on Visa
Liberalisation presented to the two countries in November 2010 and January
2011 respectively. Reports on progress made by Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova on implementation of the Action Plans, issued by the Commission
services and the EEAS in September 2011 and February 2012 confirmed that the
Action Plans are powerful tools for advancing reforms in partner countries in
the area of JFS. An expert mission to Georgia, which took place in March 2012,
assessed Georgia’s readiness to start a visa liberalisation dialogue with the
EU. Ø
Application of the Visa Code Since April 2011, Schengen countries are
obliged, under the EU Visa Code, to give reasons for a visa refusal and
to offer the possibility of an appeal. In 2011, particular attention was paid
to establishing effective local Schengen cooperation between Schengen consular
services in the EaP partner countries.
2.4.
Comprehensive Institution Building Programmes
In addition to and complementing the
ongoing implementation of assistance programmes - which include important
institution building components - work continued with five EaP partners (all
except Belarus) on the launch of Comprehensive Institution Building
Programmes (CIB). With a total budget of €167.4
million, CIB are specifically intended to help partner countries meet the
pre-conditions for negotiating and concluding AAs and DCFTAs, and their related
commitments. Technical assistance has been provided to
help all partners develop the institutional reform plans for the targeted
institutions. At the beginning of 2012, most countries have finalised the
reform plans; many of them have been formally adopted, thus paving the way for
the CIB implementation phase.
3.
Participation in EU Programmes and Agencies and
Sector Co-operation
3.1.
Participation of partner countries in EU
programmes and Agencies
To help making further progress with regard
to EaP countries’ participation in the work of EU agencies and programmes, EaP
countries were invited in 2011 to express their specific priorities and
interests. On this basis, a first indicative list of priority EU programmes for
participation of partner countries was established. Protocols allowing for the participation of
the Republic of Moldova and Ukraine in EU programmes entered into force in May
and November 2011 respectively. Following signature of a Memorandum of
Understanding, the Republic of Moldova was associated to the 7th
Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development (FP 7) from
January 2012. Protocols with further EaP countries can be negotiated, based on
mutual agreement. Cooperation between EU agencies and EaP countries continued
in 2011, notably in the areas of justice and home affairs, aviation safety
(European Aviation Safety Agency) and health (European Centre for Disease
Prevention and Control). Efforts were also made to strengthen cooperation with
other agencies in the area of justice, freedom and security. The EU is also
preparing an assistance project to support preparatory measures facilitating cooperation between the EU agencies and the EaP
countries. Possible co-funding of participation in EU programmes can be granted under the
national allocations of the ENPI.
3.2.
Energy and Transport
Energy
Community/Integrating energy markets With a view to enhancing common energy
security, Eastern partners are committed to gradually integrating with EU
energy markets, in particular through approximating with EU internal energy
market rules and strengthening network interconnections. Involvement in the Energy Community
strongly supports such integration. In February 2011 Ukraine became a member of
this Community; it now needs to implement fully the Energy Community Treaty
obligations. In 2011, the Republic of Moldova held the Community’s rotating
Presidency and took steps to implement Treaty obligations. Georgia continued its observership and Armenia became an observer. Azerbaijan and the EU
strengthened their energy partnership, including on the strategic Southern
Corridor and continued the dialogue on approximation with the EU internal
energy market rules. The EU and Belarus discussed market integration in the
course of their technical energy dialogue. Several energy network projects advanced in
2011. On the Southern Corridor, Azerbaijan and Turkey agreed transit and gas sale terms on the Azerbaijani
Shah Deniz II field. The EU, Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan started negotiations
on a trans-Caspian gas pipeline. A feasibility study was launched on the
Azerbaijan-Georgia-Romania Interconnection project, aiming to export liquefied
natural gas through the Black Sea. Azerbaijan, Georgia, Lithuania, Poland and Ukraine furthered their work towards a Euro-Asian Oil Transportation Corridor.
Azerbaijan, Georgia and Turkey continued developing the Black Sea Electricity
Transmission line. Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova pursued their efforts on
future interconnection of their electricity
networks to the continental European power system. Following up the 2009
EU-Ukraine conference on modernisation of
the Ukrainian gas transit system, the EU-supported feasibility study and
environmental and social impact study progressed. The EU is giving
a particular attention to strengthening transport cooperation with the
EaP countries. Transport Ministers of the EU and the partner countries set out
key priorities for cooperation in a Joint Declaration on transport cooperation
between the EU and EaP countries. To oversee transport cooperation and to
streamline the implementation of regional transport cooperation, the ministers
established the EaP Transport Panel in October 2011. In the aviation sector,
comprehensive air services agreement was initialled with the Republic of Moldova in October 2011 and is expected to be signed soon. In October, the EU
Member States granted the Commission a mandate to negotiate a similar agreement
with Azerbaijan and negotiations should start in the first half of 2012.
Economic impact of concluding such an agreement with Armenia has been examined.
The EU and Georgia have already signed a comprehensive air services agreement
in 2010. The agreements aim to open the respective markets and integrate the
partner countries into a wider European common aviation area. Partner countries
will harmonise their legislation with the EU standards and implement EU
aviation rules. A draft agreement with Ukraine remains under negotiations.
3.3.
Environment and Climate Change
3.3.1.
Environment
Progress towards a green economy is a key
objective within the EaP. In 2011, the EU assisted partners identify relevant
measures. A dedicated study and a seminar were organised. An EU-financed study
was also published to highlight the social, health and economic benefits of
enhanced environment protection in partner countries. The Shared Environmental Information System
is being developed to improve collection and management of environmental data
and indicators. EaP countries adopted (Belarus and Ukraine) or prepared (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia and the Republic of Moldova) national environmental action plans or
strategies. The Republic of Moldova published a state-of-the-environment report
and Ukraine adopted legislation on access to information. Administrative
capacity remains a challenge and environmental impact assessments require
attention. An EU-financed project on air quality
governance was launched, and several other projects advanced, for example on
waste management and forest law enforcement and governance. The EU also
allocated funding to tackle obsolete pesticides. The Regional Environmental
Centres in the Republic of Moldova and in Southern Caucasus continued their
activities. Implementation of ratified multilateral environment agreements
requires attention.
3.3.2.
Climate change
The EaP Warsaw Summit recognised the
importance of taking action to address climate change, promoting relevant
dialogue and sharing best practices. The EU allocated €18 million for a
regional project on climate change mitigation and adaptation. Action taken by EaP partners in 2011
includes submission by Azerbaijan of its second national communication to
the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), preparation
of mitigation and adaptation strategies by the Republic of Moldova, organisation of its third climate week by Georgia, and preparation by Ukraine of legislation on emissions trading. Eastern
partners are encouraged to build capacity and engage in the new carbon
market mechanism to be developed following the 17th Conference of
the Parties (COP) of the UNFCCC in Durban. They are also encouraged to fully
implement the agreements on climate action reached at the Cancun and Durban
COPs and in particular to device low-carbon development strategies.
3.4.
Pilot regional development programmes (PRDPs)
After a meeting with partner countries
representatives in Brussels in June to further explain and clarify the PRDP
approach, the partner countries were invited to share their regional
development strategies with the EU. Some of these, such as the strategy for the
Republic of Moldova, provide a good basis for developing PRDPs. Other
countries still have to work on their strategies. The cohesion dimension, i.e reducing
social and economic disparities between regions, which is the cornerstone of
the PRDPs, was not always properly addressed in the documents presented and
discussions are still on-going with the partner countries. In addition, given the large budget support
programmes for regional development which are currently on-going in Ukraine and Georgia, it was necessary to better define the specificity and added-value of the PRDPs.
In the framework of these programmes, complementary specific activities will be
identified, to be financed through the additional PRDP funds. 3.5. European Neighbourhood Programme for Agriculture and Rural
Development (ENPARD) In order to take forward ENPARD in the
Eastern Neighbourhood, the European Commission has started negotiations with
FAO in order to launch an assessment of the agriculture and rural development
sectors in partner countries. The study is aimed at supporting Eastern European
partners in the review of their agriculture policies and strategies and
identify with them possible areas of possible future support. In Georgia, a large programme to support the agriculture sector, already in line with the
ENPARD approach, is being finalized in close cooperation with the
Commission.
3.6 Common Knowledge and Information
Space
The development of a Common Knowledge and Innovation
Space with the EaP Partners necessitates cooperation of research, coordination
and networking between stakeholders and will require increased efforts from all
EaP countries in building research capacity and increasing collaboration with
EU researchers and research organisation. An important element of reaching this
objective is the current active participation of partners in the EU’s FP 7. FP
7 is fully open for the participation of researchers and research organisations
in the EaP countries. However, current levels of participation are moderate and
increased efforts are needed in all EaP countries to promote actively the
opportunities available to their research communities. Specific support in this
regard has been provided through the FP 7 International Cooperation (INCO)
programme, which has offered opportunities to build research capacities and to
promote Science and Technology (S&T) relations and the coordination of
national research activities and the international cooperation activities of
the EU Member States with the region. Current projects include: the
International Cooperation Network for Central Asian and South Caucasus
countries, the S&T International Cooperation Network for Eastern European
and Central Asian Countries and the European Research Area Network (ERANET)
project Black Sea-ERA.NET on Networking on Science and Technology in the Black
Sea Region.
4.
Strengthening of Multilateral Co-operation [1]
In 2011, each of the four EaP multilateral
thematic platforms met twice. They continued to implement their work programmes
and prepared new ones for 2012 – 2013. The platforms have established several
new expert panels and provided input to the design of the flagship initiatives.
Partners, EU Member States, EU institutions, international organisations and
the EaP Civil Society Forum (CSF) have actively contributed and offered support
and expertise to seminars and training programmes. Assistance from
international organisations and international financing institutions (IFIs) has
also been provided through different channels. During the Polish Presidency of
the EU in the second half of the year, Poland hosted a significant number of
sector meetings at ministerial level with partner countries.
4.1.
Platform 1 - Democracy, good governance and
stability
Platform 1 aims to promote democratic
principles, good governance and stability by improving key sectors of
governance. Its 2009-11 work programme focused on improving the functioning of
the judiciary, the fight against corruption, public administration reform and
safe management of state borders. The implementation of the activities of the
Platform is supported by the Council of Europe (CoE) under a CoE facility
agreed for that purpose. Implementation of activities started in March 2011.
The facility covers activities on electoral standards, judicial reform, good
governance, the fight against corruption and cooperation against cybercrime. In the field of integrated border
management (IBM), the EaP IBM panel met twice in 2011, in Vilnius and Tbilisi. The meetings took stock of implementation of the flagship initiative
and discussed IBM strategies, the fight against smuggling of goods, especially
cigarettes, green border surveillance and early-warning mechanisms. The
Commission’s Action Plan to fight against the smuggling of cigarettes and
alcohol along the EU Eastern Border[2]
was presented to the participants. The EuroEast Police project on cooperation
between law enforcement agencies against cross-border crime between the
EU and the EaP countries advanced through its identification phase with a view
to the Commission decision due in 2012 in line with the Council conclusions of 13
December 2011 on cooperation in the areas of justice and home affairs within
the Eastern Partnership. The panel on the fight against
corruption reviewed the situation in partner countries with technical
assistance from the CoE. The panel’s work plan was approved in Tbilisi in May 2011 at the same time as launching a number of regional seminars and
initiatives implemented by CoE. Good expert cooperation has been established
with the EaP Civil Society Forum. Platform 1 continued preparing the work
plan of the panel on improving the judiciary in order to
reinforce the bilateral work undertaken to secure greater judicial
independence, effectiveness and impartiality of justice. Meanwhile,
the CoE has continued implementing the justice component of the CoE facility. The first panel on public
administration reform met in Tallinn in October and agreed its
three-year work programme. The work has already been started by thematic
seminars and workshops on e-government and efficient local and regional level
administrations held in 2011 in Tallinn and Kharkov respectively. Bringing the Söderköping process under the aegis of the EaP in 2011 enhanced the
dialogue and cooperation on the broader migration agenda. The new EaP panel
on migration and asylum will help to strengthen asylum and migration
systems of Eastern partners and advance the dialogue on migration and asylum
issues amongst the Eastern partners and between them and the EU. The first
meeting of this panel was held in Stockholm in December 2011.
4.2.
Platform 2 - Economic integration and
convergence with EU sector policies
A. Areas of Work covered by the platform Fifth platform meeting (May 2011) The platform followed up the discussion on
labour market and social policies and discussed cooperation on questions of
fiscal, exchange rate and monetary policy along with regional economic cooperation Sixth platform meeting on (October 2011) The platform focused on its new work
programme 2012-2013, cooperation in the field of labour market and social
policies and cooperation on transport. B. Areas of work covered by panels 1. Trade and Trade Related Regulatory
Cooperation linked to DCFTAs The negotiations on DCFTAs between the EU and
its Eastern partners aim, inter alia, to increase access to each other’s
markets in order to provide exporters with a better opportunity to expand their
presence on foreign markets. Five trade panels were organised in 2011 in Brussels (February, March, June, October and December). They discussed: - Technical
regulations and standards, providing an overview of the EU legislative
framework for marketing products; - DCFTAs and the
involvement of Chambers of Commerce in interaction with governments plus their
support to the member companies to benefit from the DCFTAs; - Competition
policy, presenting an overview of the acquis communautaire in the
trade-related fields; - Services,
investments and capital movement and - Trade in goods. 2. Environment and Climate Change A seminar on promotion
of the green economy was held in Brussels in July. As background, the EU
commissioned a study on Opportunities and options for promoting green economy
in the EaP countries. The seminar discussed its results, presented views on
greening the economy and made recommendations for future action, including with
possible EU finance. The second panel on the environment and climate change took
place in Brussels in September and established a flagship initiative to set up
a Shared Environmental Information System in the ENP East area. 3. Small and Medium-sized Enterprise (SME) policy A seminar with the SME
coordinators of the six EaP partners was organised under the auspices of the
SME panel in Brussels in March, co-chaired by the EU and the OECD. The purpose
was to familiarise the SME coordinators with various aspects of the Small
Business Act that will be covered within the EaP project on Enterprise Policy
Assessment conducted by the EU, the OECD, the EBRD and the European Training
Foundation. Preliminary results were discussed at the SME panel meeting in June
in Prague, which focused on Enterprise and Competitiveness Policies and was
organised back to back with an OECD ministerial meeting on Enterprise and
Competitiveness Policies for Eastern Europe and the South Caucasus countries.
In June, a combined OECD/EU working group was opened by a first round table on
the results of the self-assessments of the partner countries regarding the EaP
project on Enterprise Policy Assessment. The SME panel meeting focussed on
access to finance and responsiveness of the administration to the problems of
the SMEs (Think Small First). The Commission informed participants on the state
of play with the SME flagship initiative. 4. Transport The transport panel was
established by Transport Ministers of EU Member States and of the Eastern
Partnership countries in October 2011 with the task of following up actions set
out in the Commission Communication 'The EU and its neighbouring regions: A
renewed approach to transport cooperation'[3].
The first transport panel meeting was organised in October and discussed both
policy reforms and infrastructure connections. C. Conferences, seminars and other activities 1. Labour market and social policies The
Commission awarded the contract for a study on the Costs and benefits of labour
mobility between the EU and the Eastern Partnership partner countries. 2. Cooperation in
the field of transport In 2011, the EU and the
partner countries took several steps to strengthen transport cooperation under
the EaP initiative. The Commission organised a transport seminar in March to
consult the EU Member States the partner countries and IFIs on key issues of
cooperation. 3. Cooperation in
the field of statistics Following a seminar on
quality in statistics in June, the national statistical offices of the ENP-East
countries undertook to start developing a comprehensive quality assurance framework
to improve the quality of their statistics in key domains and to review
progress in this matter in one year’s time. In
addition, in October, a Polish Presidency conference on the Development of the European Statistical System within Eastern
Partnership – directions and strategy, identified three areas where work is
needed in order to help the statistical systems in the region reach European
standards.
4.3.
Platform 3 - Energy security
A. Areas of work covered by the platform Fifth platform meeting (April 2011 in Brussels) The
meeting took place as part of the Sustainable Energy Week and was devoted to
energy efficiency. Partners presented developments and projects supporting
energy efficiency. Specific attention was paid to the Covenant of Mayors[4], including presentations by Tbilisi, Lviv and Vila Nova de Gaia (Portugal). Sixth
platform meeting (October in Chisinau) The meeting was held back to back with the
Ministerial Council of the Energy Community. It was the first meeting of a
platform in a partner country. The meeting focussed on energy developments in
the Republic of Moldova, recent EU and EBRD initiatives and assistance to
partner countries, in particular within the INOGATE energy cooperation
programme. The work programme of the Platform for 2012-13 was discussed.
Partner countries informed about their security of supply developments. The
participants agreed that the Committee of the Regions and the European Economic
and Social Committee (EESC) become permanent participants of this platform. B. Conferences, seminars and other
activities In 2011, platform 3
meetings were organised back to back with other energy events to which partners
were invited. For example, participants of the platform attended numerous
seminars organised by the Commission during the Sustainable Energy Week
(April), where EU initiatives on improving energy efficiency and increasing use
of renewables in the energy mix were presented. In October, platform 3
participants attended a Social Forum organised by the Energy Community. A joint
meeting between platform 3 and the Permanent High-Level Group of the Energy
Community was also held.
Conference on energy security The conference was
organised by the EESC with support of Hungarian Presidency, in Hungary in April.
4.4.
Platform 4 - Contacts between people
Platform 4 supports
interaction between EU and partner countries’ citizens, focusing in particular
on students, teachers, researchers, young people and cultural workers. It also
supports development of the information society in the partner countries. In 2011, cooperation under this platform
continued to be organised around a number of EU cooperation programmes, in
the areas of higher education, youth, culture and research. Attention was paid
to modernisation of higher education, to mobility of students, teachers,
researchers and young people and to capacity-building and exchange of
experience in cultural circles. A large regional Tempus
and Erasmus Mundus information day
was organised in December in Ukraine. A high level event on the mobility of students, academic staff, researchers, youth and
cultural workers to and from the EaP countries called ‘the Eastern dimension of mobility’ took place in Warsaw in June. EaP countries have expressed their interest in participating in the
partial extension of the eTwinning programme for schools. The Commission has entered into the negotiation phase which should lead to the
setting-up of Partner Support Agencies. Alongside this preparatory work, the Central
Support Service of the eTwinning programme will create
a new web portal for EaP school users. The results of a study on teacher
education in the EaP countries were
discussed with Ministries of Education and teacher training institutions
during a seminar held in Baku in October. The EaP Culture Programme
supports the development of local cultural policies. It involves
capacity-building in institutions, monitoring, coaching and coordination of
projects, and collection and dissemination of results. As a follow-up to the enlarged Cultural Contact Points meeting of March 2010, a regional seminar
was held in Georgia in April 2011. It discussed how to make best use of the
capacity-building component of the EaP Culture Programme and how to raise the
profile of culture in a broader
context. A regional Monitoring and
Capacity-building Unit opened in Kiev in October. In the same month, the technical assistance team also started up round table discussions in
each partner country. Under the published call for
proposals, 15 grant contracts were
signed in December. An expert round table for stakeholders in the new EaP Youth
Programme from the EaP partner countries was held in the Republic of Moldova in May to finalise identification of needs. The results of this round
table fed into the EaP Youth Programme, with a total budget of
€5.5 million which was approved in November. It will be composed of two
complementary actions: the EaP Youth Programme that will mainly focus on the
capacity-building of youth institutions in the region, and the grant component
that will support concrete projects through a special window in the Youth
Action Programme. Work on the Information
Society focused on mapping of information and communication technology
(ICT) stakeholders, identifying research potential and priorities, organising training
and assistance and enhancing the ICT policy dialogue. Cooperation between
telecommunications regulators continued at workshops in June in Lithuania and in November in Spain. Work continued on improving high-speed connectivity with
partner countries under the Black Sea interconnectivity
initiative. In the field of research and innovation, all Eastern partners continued to participate in the FP 7. Participation by researchers and research
organisations in FP 7 continued to increase, notably in the Marie
Curie international research staff exchange
scheme and in the second European Research Area-wide call; both of which are
targeted (in part) to the EaP region. Following the conclusion of a
Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the EU, the Republic of Moldova is now formally associated with FP 7. Support from
the EaP continued to provide an opportunity to increase networking with
national contact points from the MS and the countries associated with FP
7. Thanks to this support, the legal and financial contacts for FP 7 in the EaP
countries attended two training sessions in Brussels. Armenia, Belarus, the Republic of Moldova and Ukraine appointed legal and
financial contacts for FP 7; Azerbaijan and Georgia are encouraged to do so.
4.5.
EaP flagship initiatives
The Integrated
Border Management (IBM) flagship initiative continued its activities
in 2011. Its general aim is to improve security, reduce smuggling and human
trafficking, and to facilitate mobility of people. Other aims are to help
partner countries to develop integrated border management strategies and align
their border management rules with EU standards. Exchanges of best
practices are taking place in a dedicated panel on IBM. Moreover, the IBM
flagship initiative training project – with a budget of €2 million – is
focusing on training and capacity-building of partners’ border authorities.
Several regional and national activities with the participation of
representatives of the customs and border guard services of the EaP countries
were carried out in the following areas: support for implementation of border
management and action plans; document integrity and security; detection of
drugs and smuggled products; protection of intellectual property rights; and
anti-corruption. A series of training
sessions for representatives of customs and border guard services were also
held as part of the project (295 members of staff of the beneficiary
institutions have been trained). In addition, a survey
has been launched to assess the achievements of the EaP IBM Flagship Initiative
Training (and other pilot projects). It is intended to collect the views and
experiences of civil society representatives who are especially involved in
cross-border movements of persons and goods, such as business associations,
travel agencies and non-governmental organisations. The first results were
expected in March 2012. Finally, the first pilot projects to enhance selected
border crossing points between EaP countries were approved. These projects
concern the Belarus-Ukraine border (Strengthening surveillance capacity on the
green and blue border between the Republic of Belarus and Ukraine - €2.6 million) and the Georgia-Armenia border (Enhancement of the border management
capabilities at the Ninotsminda-Bavra border crossing point – €2.9 million).
These projects will provide expertise, equipment and infrastructure. The Prevention,
Preparedness and Response to natural and man-made Disasters flagship
initiative (PPRD-East) is building up the capacity of participating
countries for disaster prevention, preparedness and response at local, national
and regional levels, and promoting cooperation with the EU and between the EaP
countries. The first phase, already being implemented with a budget of €6
million, is reviewing existing resources and mechanisms available in the EaP
countries and preparing a regional risk atlas. The Small and
Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) flagship initiative was set up to
support the needs of SMEs in the EaP countries and to provide an external
stimulus to growth and employment, with a total budget of around €34 million.
It supports initiatives to improve the business climate, extend the advisory
services to SMEs and establish an SME funding facility. The flagship initiative
includes three components:
East-Invest, an investment and trade facilitation
project (with a budget of approx. €9 million) which provides technical
assistance to business support organisations and SMEs from the EaP
countries. In July around 40 representatives of business organisations
from the EaP countries participated in the East-Invest Academy (Irpen, Ukraine). Two ‘Train the trainers’ seminars were organised in spring in Minsk and Chisinau on EU acquis and internationalisation for 15 representatives of
business organisations. Following these trainings, the trained trainers
have given, together with international trainers, four seminars on the
same topic. More than 200 SMEs benefited from such trainings on EU acquis
and internationalisation across the region.
Enterprise Growth Programme (EGP) and Business
Advisory Services (BAS) (both small business programmes) are technical
assistance programmes, implemented by the European Bank for Reconstruction
and Development (EBRD) and funded by the EU (€10 million for the period
from 2010 to 2014). It aims to support sustainable development of the
SMEs in the Eastern partner countries and to build a
competitive infrastructure of local advisory services. EGP provides
transfer of commercial and technical know-how from experienced senior
managers from EU SMEs and BAS promotes involvement with local consulting
services while supporting consolidation of local consultancy. Concrete
examples in 2011 included: development of streamline organisational
structure and strategy, development of Human Resources policy, new sales
and marketing strategy, development of management information system,
development of computerised financial management etc.
In 2011, 17 EGP projects have started (with duration of
approximately 1 to 1.5 years) and 156 BAS projects (shorter projects
of approximately 4 to 6 months), out of which 79 BAS projects have already
been completed in the entire region.
SMEs Funding Facility
Project, with a budget of €15 million provided by the EU as risk-sharing
cushion to leverage loans for SMEs from European financial institutions through
the intermediary of local financial institutions. Several loans have been signed
to date with local banks for on-lending to SMEs, such as: TBC Bank, ProCredit
Bank, VneshtorgBank and the Bank of Georgia, BT Leasing in the Republic of Moldova, Ukrexim in Ukraine, etc. The Regional Electricity Markets, Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy Sources flagship initiative is
focusing on improving integration of the electricity grid and encouraging
sustainable energy as ways to address security of energy supply. This flagship imitative
is supported, inter alia, by the EU’s regional energy cooperation
programme INOGATE. In 2011, INOGATE provided funding of approximately €53
million for projects to support development of regional energy markets, energy
efficiency and renewable energy sources. Another key activity
under this flagship initiative is the Covenant of Mayors, (CoM), which is being
extended beyond the EU. Over 40 cities from the EaP region have already joined
the CoM, thereby committing themselves to reduce their CO2 emissions by 20% by
2020. Branch offices of the CoM were opened in Lviv and Tbilisi in 2011. The EaP flagship
Initiative on Environmental Governance aims at promoting
environment protection by strengthening environmental governance in the partner
countries. With a total financial envelope of around €32 million, these
programmes address the main environmental challenges in the region, ranging
from waste management to water and quality, including forestry, with a
particular focus on improving management capacities on environmental
information. Thanks to the active involvement of the partner countries,
opportunities to move towards a greener economy have been identified and will
be translated into a new regional programme. In addition, climate change
adaptation and mitigation will be addressed by the Clima-East package (€18
million).
4.6.
Relations with other stakeholders
Euronest Parliamentary
Assembly A Euronest
Parliamentary Assembly (Euronest PA) was established at its constituent meeting
on 3 May 2011. Its main goal is to support and promote the EaP and to provide a
platform for parliamentary debate, control and review of all issues relating to
the EaP. The Euronest PA met for its first ordinary session in Strasbourg on 15 September. Conference of Regional and Local Authorities of the EaP (CORLEAP) The
first meeting of CORLEAP took place on 8 September 2011 and laid the
foundations for the regional dimension of the Partnership. It aims to
facilitate local and regional authorities’ contribution to the development of
the EaP. The Conference adopted recommendations for the EaP and called for the
implementation of projects to enhance local democracy and good governance at
regional and local levels. Civil Society
Forum (CSF) The CSF continued its
activities. The CSF Steering Committee and four working groups held regular
meetings bringing together civil society organisations from the EaP and the EU,
including the EESC. The CSF has been engaged in cooperation with
representatives of governments by participating in activities of the EaP
panels. Moreover, in November representatives of the Forum were invited to
participate in all EaP Platforms as permanent participants. CSF National
Platforms have been established in six EaP countries and were consolidated
throughout the year. In September EU Delegations in EaP countries organised meetings
with members of national platforms with the participation of representatives of
partners’ governments, laying the foundations for a structured dialogue. (It is
not a dialogue between civil society and government – it is a dialogue between
EU and civil society with participation of government – in other words it is
not up to us to organise dialogue between civil society and government but
facilitate and encourage…)A third assembly of the CSF took place in Poznan in November. It adopted a strategy for the future development of the Forum,
providing a basis for more structured involvement of the CSF in the EaP. Business Forum The first EaP Business
Forum took place in Sopot in September on the fringes of the second EaP Summit.
The Forum presented the business community’s recommendations for further
development of the EaP’s economic aspects, including special facilities to help SMEs develop in the EaP countries. Information &
Coordination Group The informal Information and Coordination
Group brings together donor countries, regional players and international
financing institutions met for the second time in June 2011. The meeting
focused on possible donor coordination in the area of SMEs.
5.
Ministerial meeting and Roadmap
On 29-30 September 2011, delegations from
27 EU member states and EaP partner countries met in Warsaw to discuss the
future of the EaP and review its achievements since it was launched. The Summit was an opportunity to renew the political commitment of participating countries to
the key objectives of the Partnership. The Warsaw meeting concluded with the
adoption of a joint Declaration, which sent a clear signal to the partners that
the EU is willing to assist them and talk about their European aspirations and
forms of tighter integration. The Summit emphasized the common values and
principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights, fundamental
freedoms and the rule of law. It acknowledged the European aspirations and the
European choice of some Eastern European countries. Because the EaP Summit was held late in the
year, the EU MS and Partner countries agreed that the anticipated Ministerial
Meeting should take place in June 2012. The Warsaw Declaration included a call to
prepare a Roadmap for the EaP which would list the objectives, instruments and
actions for the Partnership and guide and monitor their implementation until
the next Summit in the second half of 2013. The roadmap should set out clearly
and concisely the jointly agreed objectives of the EaP stemming from the Prague
and Warsaw Declarations, the reforms the partner countries aim to adopt in
order to meet their objectives, the instruments and the support that the EU
will provide and, finally, an indication of how advanced the Partner states
will be towards achieving these objectives by the second half of 2013. 1. Summary of the Comprehensive Institution-Building
(CIB) Programme
|| Armenia || Azerbaijan || Georgia || Republic of Moldova || Ukraine Indicative allocations 2011-2013 (€ million) || 32.81 || 19.20 || 30.86 || 41.16 || 43.37 CIB counterpart || Minister of Economic Affairs in dialogue with Minister for Foreign Affairs || Minister for Foreign Affairs for political steer; Minister for Economic Development for IRPs and implementation || Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of European and Euro-Atlantic Integration || General Secretariat of the Government (new name of the State Chancellery) || National Agency of Ukraine on Civil Service (NACS) (new since July 2011) Key reform areas || 1. Political association/economic integration (AA negotiations) 2. Justice, freedom and security 3. DCFTA negotiations || 1. AA negotiations and further deepening of bilateral economic and trade relations 2. Justice and home affairs, including Visa Facilitation and Readmission Agreement (VFRA) 3. Strengthening human and institutional capacity related to negotiating and implementing the future agreements || 1. Coordination of AA negotiations 2. Consolidation of democratic reforms, human rights and good governance (oversight institutions) 3. Trade, market and regulatory reform, DCFTA negotiations || 1. Public administration reform 2. Rule of law and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms 3. Preparations for future DCFTA || 1. Steering and implementation of AA and DCFTA 2. Trade: Sanitary and phytosanitary measures (SPS) 3. Trade — state aid monitoring 4. Migration Signature of MoU/framework document || 24/11/2010 || 13/1/2011 || 2/10/2010 || 15/5/2010 (MoU) 26/11/2010 (FD) || 14 October 2010 State of preparation of Institutional Reform Plans (IRPs) || All three IRPs finalised and adopted in December 2011 || - Cluster 1: draft IRP, to be finalised (expected May 2012) Cluster2: draft IRP, to be finalised (expected March 2012) - Cluster 3: IRP completed (formal approval expected April 2012) || All IRPs (8) formally approved || All IRPs finalised – one for each Ministry/Agency, called Strategic Development Programmes (SDP). Most of them (24 out of 27) formally approved. || Cluster 1: IRP in the area of policy making for future EU-Ukraine Association Agreement is being revised by the MFA following the EU-Ukraine Summit on 19/12 Cluster 2: IRP on SPS agreed by the main stake-holders, currently undergoing a legal expertise in the Ministry of Justice Cluster 3: IRP on state aid: postponed until adoption of the law on state aid Cluster 4: IRP has been formally adopted on 12 October 2011 CIB funding || € 6.8 million in 2011 AAP; € 15 million earmarked in AAP 2012 || € 3 million in AAP 2011; € 7.8 million earmarked in AAP 2012 || € 7.345 million in AAP 2011; € 11 million earmarked in AAP 2012 || € 8 million in AAP 2011; € 17 million earmarked in AAP 2012 || € 20 million in AAP 2011; € 12 million earmarked in AAP 2012 Institutions to be part of CIB || Cluster 1: Ministry for Foreign Affairs, Diplomatic Academy Cluster 2: Ministry for Foreign Affairs, State Migration Services, National Security Services, Police Cluster 3: Min. of Economic Affairs and a number of implementing agencies || Cluster 1: Ministry of Foreign Affairs; Ministry of Economic Development; Ministry of Taxes; Ministry of Agriculture; State Customs Committee; State Procurement Agency; State Committee on Standardisation, Metrology and Patents; Copyright Agency Cluster 2: Ministry of Justice; Judicial Legal Council; Ministry of Interior; Ministry of Foreign Affairs; Ministry of Labour; State Border Service; State Migration Service; Ombudsman; Commission against Corruption; Central Election Commission Cluster 3: Civil Service Commission; Diplomatic Academy- || Cluster 1: Ministry of Foreign Affairs; Ministry of European and Euro-Atlantic Integration; Prime Minister’s office; Civil Registry Agency (under Ministry of Justice); "Matsne" (legal entity on charge of official translations, under Ministry of Justice) Cluster 2: Public Defender’s Office; Chamber of Control; Parliament Cluster 3: National Service for Food Safety, Veterinary and Plant protection; National Accreditation Centre; National Agency for Standards, Technical Regulations and Metrology; Competition Authority || Cluster 1: State Chancellery; Ministry of Finance; Public Procurement Agency Cluster 2: Ministry of Internal Affairs; Centre for Combating Economic Crimes and Corruption; General Prosecutor’s Office Cluster 3: Ministry of Economy; National Agency for the Protection of Competition; State Agency on Intellectual Property; Ministry of Agriculture and Food Industry; General Inspectorate for Phyto-Sanitary Surveillance and Seed Control; Sanitary-Veterinary and Animal Origin Food Safety Agency; Public Health Service of the Ministry of Health || Cluster 1: Secretariat of Cabinet of Ministers; Main. Dept of Civil Service; Ministry of Economy; Ministry of Finance; Ministry of Justice Cluster 2: Ministry of Agrarian Policy; State Committees for Technical Regulation for Veterinary Medicine; National Commission for Codex Alimentarius Cluster 3: Antimonopoly Commission; Ministry of Finance Cluster 4: Ministry of Interior; State Committee for Nationalities and Religions; State Border Guard Service Summary of the EaP Flagship Initiatives EaP flagship initiative || Project name || Total budget || Funds committed by the end of 2011 || Comments Integrated Border Management (IBM) || EaP IBM flagship initiative training project Commission programme supporting IBM systems in the South Caucasus Pilot projects on the Belarus-Ukraine border and Georgia-Armenia border || €2 million €6.316.000 (the EU contribution amounts to EUR 6 million) €5.5 million || €2 million €6 million €5.5 million || Implementation began in January 2011 Project included in the IBM flagship initiative when the initiative was created Further pilot projects will be funded in 2012 and 2013 Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SME) Facility || EAST INVEST — Eastern Partnership/SME Facility SME Finance Facility — EIB window TurnAround Management and Business Advisory Services (TAM-BAS) Programme in the Eastern partner countries Enterprise policy performance assessment of the EaP countries || €8.75 million €15 million €10 million €5 million || €7 million €15 million €10 million €0.5 million || Regional Electricity Markets, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Sources (objectives of the initiative are supported by the INOGATE Programme) || Supporting participation by EaP and Central Asian cities in the CoM INOGATE Technical Secretariat and Integrated Programme to support the Baku Initiative and the EaP energy objectives || € 5 million €17 million || €4 967 700 €16 576 230 || In 2011 nine projects in the areas of energy market convergence, sustainable energy and security of energy supply were ongoing under the INOGATE Programme in the EaP region with a value of approximately EUR 36 million Prevention, Preparedness and Responses to natural and man-made Disasters (PPRD) || Programme for Prevention, Preparedness and Response to man-made and natural Disasters (PPRD-East) || €11 million || €5 988 000 || A second phase should be launched in 2013 Environmental Governance || Towards a Shared Environmental Information System – SEIS – in the ENPI region || €13 million || €3 million Projects worth a total of €22 million are ongoing in support of the initiative (i.e. waste governance, air quality, FLEG (Forest Law Enforcement and Governance) and SEIS) || EUR 10 million will be added to support this flagship initiative until 2013 Summary of the Eastern Partnership multilateral
financing activities Project name || Total budget || Funds committed by the end of 2011 || Comments EaP Culture Programme || €12 million || €12 million || €3 million for reforms of public institutions and the cultural sector and €9 million in grants to civil society cultural organisations Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law ─ CoE Facility || €4 million || €4 million || Implementation started in 2011 EaP Youth Programme || €5.5 million || €5.5 million || Support for stakeholders in the youth sector (€3 million) and grants scheme (€2.5 million) EaP Territorial Cooperation Support Programme || €18 million (€5.5 million for technical assistance contract in 2012 and €12.5 million for projects in 2013 || €5.5 million for technical assistance || The budget for the projects will be committed in 2013 || || || [1]. Belarus participates in the multilateral track of the EaP. [2]. SEC(2011)791 [3] COM(415) 7.7.2011 [4] The Covenant of Mayors, involving regional and local authorities
from the EU and beyond, aims to meet and exceed the European Union 20% CO2 reduction
objective by 2020.