This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2004/085/03
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 February 2004 in Case C-265/00 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de justice Benelux): Campina Melkunie BV v Benelux-Merkenbureau (Approximation of laws — Trade marks — Directive 89/104/EEC — Article 3(1) — Ground for refusal to register — Neologism composed of elements each of which is descriptive of characteristics of the goods or services concerned)
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 February 2004 in Case C-265/00 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de justice Benelux): Campina Melkunie BV v Benelux-Merkenbureau (Approximation of laws — Trade marks — Directive 89/104/EEC — Article 3(1) — Ground for refusal to register — Neologism composed of elements each of which is descriptive of characteristics of the goods or services concerned)
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 February 2004 in Case C-265/00 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de justice Benelux): Campina Melkunie BV v Benelux-Merkenbureau (Approximation of laws — Trade marks — Directive 89/104/EEC — Article 3(1) — Ground for refusal to register — Neologism composed of elements each of which is descriptive of characteristics of the goods or services concerned)
Úř. věst. C 85, 3.4.2004, p. 3–4
(ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT, FI, SV)