EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62001CJ0441
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 May 2003. # Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of the Netherlands. # Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 89/391/EEC - Measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work - Article 7(3). # Case C-441/01.
Rozsudek Soudního dvora (pátého senátu) ze dne 22. května 2003.
Komise Evropských společenství proti Nizozemskému království.
Nesplnění povinnosti státem.
Věc C-441/01.
Rozsudek Soudního dvora (pátého senátu) ze dne 22. května 2003.
Komise Evropských společenství proti Nizozemskému království.
Nesplnění povinnosti státem.
Věc C-441/01.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2003:308
«(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 89/391/EEC – Measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work – Article 7(3))»
|
I - 0000 | |||
|
I - 0000 | |||
(Council Directive 89/391, Art. 7(1), (3), (4) and (6))
(Council Directive 89/391, Art. 7)
(Council Directive 89/391, Art. 7(1) and (3))
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber)
22 May 2003 (1)
((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 89/391/EEC – Measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work – Article 7(3)))
In Case C-441/01, Commission of the European Communities, represented by H. van Vliet and H. Kreppel, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg,applicant,
v
Kingdom of the Netherlands, represented by H.G. Sevenster, acting as Agent,defendant,
APPLICATION for a declaration that, by authorising employers to choose freely whether to make use of internal or external health and safety services, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EC Treaty and Article 7(3) of Council Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work (OJ 1989 L 183, p. 1),THE COURT (Fifth Chamber),,
having regard to the Report for the Hearing,
after hearing oral argument from the parties at the hearing on 28 November 2002, at which the Commission was represented by H. van Vliet and the Kingdom of the Netherlands by N.A.J. Bel, acting as Agent,after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 16 January 2003,
gives the following
On those grounds,
THE COURT (Fifth Chamber)
hereby:
Timmermans |
La Pergola |
Jann |
von Bahr |
Rosas |
|
R. Grass |
M. Wathelet |
Registrar |
President of the Fifth Chamber |