This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020CO0050
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 September 2020.
ZW v European Investment Bank.
Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Rejection of candidature – Complaint with the European Ombudsman – Action for annulment and for damages – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.
Case C-50/20 P.
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 September 2020.
ZW v European Investment Bank.
Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Rejection of candidature – Complaint with the European Ombudsman – Action for annulment and for damages – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.
Case C-50/20 P.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2020:652
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 – ZW v EIB
(Case C‑50/20 P)
(Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Rejection of candidature – Complaint with the European Ombudsman – Action for annulment and for damages – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
|
1. |
Appeal – Judgment of the Court of Justice – Obligation to address the pleas and claims of the parties – Scope (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see para. 4) |
|
2. |
Judicial proceedings – Decision taken by way of reasoned order – Challenge – Conditions – Obligation to challenge the assessment by the General Court of those conditions (Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 126) (see para. 4) |
|
3. |
Appeal – Grounds – Error of law relied on not identified – Inadmissibility (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 168(1)(d) and 169(2)) (see para. 4) |
Operative part
|
1. |
The appeal is dismissed as in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded. |
|
2. |
ZW shall bear her own costs. |