This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Scoreboard
This scoreboard sets out the measures needed to create an area of freedom, security and justice and gives an overview of the progress made in implementing them.
ACT
Commission communication of 24 March 2000: Scoreboard to review progress on the creation of an area of "Freedom, Security and Justice" in the European Union [COM(2000) 167 final - Not published in the Official Journal].
SUMMARY
The Amsterdam Treaty has laid down medium-term deadlines for adoption of the various measures required for the creation of an area of freedom, security and justice. These were fleshed out by the Vienna European Council (December 1998) and the Tampere European Council (October 1999).
By setting out the various measures and the timetable for adoption in a single "Scoreboard", the Commission aims to keep a close eye on the progress made in creating an area of freedom, security and justice.
The Scoreboard helps to:
The Scoreboard follows as closely as possible the chapter headings used in Tampere and is divided into the following columns:
The Commission will submit an updated version of the Scoreboard to the European Parliament and the Council every six months.
The Scoreboard is broken down into seven main sections:
The various elements of the Scoreboard are set out below:
1) COMMON EU ASYLUM AND MIGRATION POLICY
1.1 Partnership with countries of origin
Objective |
Action needed |
Responsibility |
Timetable for adoption |
State of play |
Assessment of countries and regions of origin and transit in order to formulate specific integrated approaches |
Continuation of the mandate of the High Level Working Group on Asylum and Migration |
Council & Commission |
- |
Ongoing work within the HLWG - Report on the implementation of the action plans already adopted: December 2000 |
- |
Assessment of other countries and regions with a view to drawing up new action plans |
Council & Commission |
April 2001 |
- |
1.2 Common European asylum system
Objective |
Action needed |
Responsibility |
Timetable for adoption |
State of play |
Determination of the State responsible for the examination of an asylum application |
Examination of the effectiveness of the Dublin Convention |
Evaluation to be conducted by the Commission |
2000 |
Launched in 2000 |
- |
Adoption of criteria and mechanisms (regulation) |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal |
April 2001 |
Proposal presented by the Commission in July 2001 |
- |
Council and Commission |
- |
The Council adopted the Regulation concerning the establishment of EURODAC in December 2000 |
|
A fair and efficient asylum procedure |
Adoption of common minimum standards on procedures for granting or withdrawing refugee status, with a view to reducing the duration of asylum procedures and with special reference to the situation of children (directive) |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal |
April 2001 |
Proposal presented by the Commission in September 2000 and currently being discussed by the Council |
- |
Definition of common minimum conditions for reception of asylum seekers (with particular attention to the situation of children) (directive) |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal |
April 2001 |
Proposal presented by the Commission in April 2001 |
- |
Commission (in part) |
- |
Communication presented by the Commission in November 2000 (COM(2001) 710 final) |
|
Uniform status throughout the Union for those who are granted asylum |
As a follow-up to the Commission communication, a legislative instrument may be needed |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal |
- |
Commission to prepare a communication |
- |
Approximation of rules on the recognition of refugee status (directive) |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal |
April 2004 |
Proposal presented by the Commission in September 2001 |
Adoption of measures on refugees and displaced persons, aimed at giving an appropriate status to any person in need of international protection |
Temporary protection in the event of mass influx of displaced persons in need of international protection (directive) |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal |
As quickly as possible |
Directive 2001/55/EC adopted in July 2001 |
- |
Subsidiary forms of protection (directive) |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal |
April 2004 |
- |
Ensuring a balance of effort between Member States in receiving refugees and displaced persons and bearing the consequences of such intake |
Setting up a European Refugee Fund (decision) |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal |
As quickly as possible |
Decision adopted by the Council in September 2000 |
- |
Setting up a financial reserve to be available in the event of mass influx of refugees |
Council and EP |
- |
Commission is exploring possibilities |
1.3 Fair treatment of third-country nationals
Objective |
Action needed |
Responsibility |
Timetable for adoption |
State of play |
Fight against all forms of discrimination, especially racism and xenophobia |
Implementation of the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of race or ethnic origin (directive) |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal |
June-December 2000 |
Directive adopted by the Council in June 2000 |
- |
Establishment of a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (directive) |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal |
- |
Directive adopted by the Council in November 2000 |
- |
Programmes drawing upon best practices and experiences (decision) |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal |
- |
Decision adopted by the Council November 2000 |
- |
Strengthening of cooperation with the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia and the Council of Europe |
Council / Commission |
- |
Official opening of the Centre on 7 April 2000 |
- |
Enhancing police and judicial cooperation in preventing and combating racism and xenophobia - Common charges for racism and xenophobia (framework decision) |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal |
- |
Second report on the implementation of the Joint Action of 15 July 1996 tabled in June 2000. Proposal for a framework decision presented by the Commission in November 2001 |
Approximation of national legislations on the conditions for admission and residence of third-country nationalsApproximation of the legal status of third-country nationals |
Assessment of present and future migration flows into the EU, with regard to demographic changes, the situation of the labour market and migration pressures from countries and regions of origin |
Council / Commission / Member States |
- |
Communication on an open method of coordination for immigration policy presented by the Commission in July 2001 |
- |
Conditions of entry and residence for the purpose of (a) family reunification, (b) study or vocational training (c) paid employment or self-employed economic activity (directives) |
Council, on the basis of Commission proposals |
- |
Commission proposal for a directive on the right to family reunification submitted to Parliament and Council on 1 December 1999. Amended proposals submitted by the Commission in October 2000 and May 2002 |
- |
Standards and procedures for the issue of long-term visas and residence permits (directive) |
Council, on the basis of Commission proposals |
- |
- |
- |
Definition of a set of uniform rights (e.g. the right to reside, receive education and work as an employee or a self-employed person) to be granted to third country nationals who have resided legally in a Member State for a certain period of time (directive) |
Council, on the basis of Commission proposals |
- |
Study put in hand by the Commission on the legal status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents in a Member State of the European Union.Proposal for a Directive presented by the Commission in March 2001 |
- |
Determination of the criteria and of the conditions under which, like Community nationals and their families, third country nationals could be allowed to settle and work in any Member State of the Union, taking account of the consequences for social equilibrium and the labour market . |
Council, on the basis of Commission proposals |
- |
Proposal for a Directive presented by the Commission in July 2001 |
1.4 Management of migration flows
Objective |
Action needed |
Responsibility |
Timetable for adoption |
State of play |
To improve the exchange of statistics and information on asylum and immigration (this exchange should include statistics as well as information on national legislations and policies) |
Further implementation of the action plan adopted by the Council in April 1998 |
Commission, in cooperation with Member States |
- |
Data collection started in October 1998; second phase (extension to candidate countries, Norway and Iceland) to be launched during the second half of 2000 (after evaluation of the initial phase) |
Setting up of a (virtual) European Migration Observatory |
Commission |
- |
Preparatory actions (on the basis of a feasibility study) financed by ODYSSEUS programme |
|
To help combat trafficking in human beings and economic exploitation of migrants |
Adoption of measures establishing minimum rules on what constitutes a criminal act and what penalties should apply to organised crime linked with trafficking of human beings (framework decision) |
Council, on the basis of Commission proposal |
- |
Proposal for a framework decision presented by the Commission in December 2000 |
- |
Detecting and dismantling the criminal networks involved by making the fight against illegal immigration one of the priorities of operational cooperation |
Member States / Europol |
- |
Communication on a common policy on illegal immigration presented by the Commission in November 2001 |
- |
Further harmonisation of Member States' laws on carrier's liability (directive) |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal or a Member State initiative |
- |
Directive 2001/51/EC approved by the Council in June 2001 |
To assist countries of origin and transit |
Development of information campaigns on the actual possibilities for legal immigration and the prevention of all forms of trafficking in human beings |
Council, on the basis of Commission proposals |
April 2001 |
- |
- |
Promotion of voluntary return |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Strengthening the capacity of the authorities in those countries to combat effectively trafficking in human beings |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Helping third countries to cope with their readmission obligations towards the Union and the Member States |
- |
- |
- |
To establish a coherent European Union policy on readmission and return |
To conclude read-mission agreements or to include standard clauses in other agreements between the European Community and relevant third countries or groups of countries |
Council, on the basis of Commission proposals |
- |
Recommendation for Commission mandates to negotiate Community readmission agreements with four third countries, tabled by the Commission on 14 February 2000 |
2) A GENUINE EUROPEAN AREA OF JUSTICE
2.1 Better access to justice in Europe
Objective |
Action needed |
Responsibility |
Timetable for adoption |
State of play |
To ensure legal security and equal access to justice |
Information campaign and publication of "user guides" on judicial cooperation within the Union |
Commission |
- |
Commission to launch preparatory work |
- |
Establishment of a permanent information system by a network of national authorities (the European Judicial Network for Civil Matters) |
Council, on the basis of a proposal by the Commission |
2001 |
Decision establishing a European Judicial Network in civil and commercial matters adopted by the Council in May 2001 |
- |
Proposal to establish minimum standards of legal aid |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal or a Member State initiative |
April 2004 |
Commission transmitted a Green Paper in February 2000; Commission is preparing a paper on recovery of legal costs and lawyer's fees and on "group actions" |
- |
Proposal on common procedural rules for small civil and commercial claims, uncontested claims and maintenance claims |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal or a Member State initiative |
April 2004 |
Proposal for a Regulation creating a European enforcement order for uncontested claims presented by the Commission in April 2002 |
- |
Proposal to establish minimum standards of quality for ADR |
Member States to set up the extra-judicial procedures |
April 2004 |
Commission issued a recommendation in 1998 on principles applicable to ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) for consumers; Commission is launching an EEJ (European Extra Judicial) Network for consumers.Green Paper on alternative dispute resolution in civil and commercial law presented by the Commission in April 2002 |
To ensure legal security and equal access to justice |
Creation of multilingual forms mutually accepted as valid documents in cross-border legal proceedings |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal or a Member State initiative |
April 2004 |
To be included in the programme on mutual recognition of judgments in civil and commercial matters |
To protect rights to compensation and to provide assistance to victims |
Drawing up of minimum standards for protection of victims |
Parliament and Council to examine the Commission's communication |
- |
Commission transmitted a communication in July 1999Green Paper on compensation to crime victims presented by the Commission in September 2001 |
- |
Further instruments on approximation of compensation arrangements for victims |
- |
2004 |
- |
2.2. Mutual recognition of judicial decisions
As regards civil matters:
Objective |
Action needed |
Responsibility |
Timetable for adoption |
State of play |
To enhance mutual recognition of judicial decisions and judgments, and the necessary approximation of legislation, to facilitate cooperation between authorities and the judicial protection of individual rights |
Programme of measures on mutual recognition of civil and commercial judgments (including measures required for mutual recognition and enforcement; abolishing obstacles to small claims and family litigation) |
Council and Commission to adopt a programme |
Programme to be adopted by the end of 2000 |
Regulation establishing a general Community framework of activities to facilitate the implementation of judicial cooperation in civil matters adopted by the Council in April 2002 |
- |
Launching of work on the European Enforcement Order |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal or a Member State initiative |
- |
This action is to be included in the programme of measures to implement the principle of mutual recognition |
- |
Proposal on minimum standards for specific aspects of civil procedures (new procedural legislation on money payments) |
- |
- |
This action is to be included in the programme of measures to implement the principle of mutual recognition |
As regards criminal matters:
Objective |
Action needed |
Responsibility |
Timetable for adoption |
State of play |
To make sure that criminals have no safe havens |
Ratification of the 1995 and 1996 EUConventions on extradition |
Member States |
April 2001 |
Six Member States ratified the 1995 ConventionSix Member States ratified the 1996 Convention |
- |
Study on abolition of formal extradition procedures concerning persons fleeing from justice after having been sentenced |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal |
End 2001 |
The Commission presented a proposal for a framework decision in September 2001The Council subsequently adopted the framework decision on the European arrest warrant |
- |
Providing for fast-track extradition procedures |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal |
End 2001 |
- |
- |
Examine the issue of extradition in relation to proceedings in absentia |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal or a Member State initiative |
April 2004 |
- |
To ensure that decisions taken in one Member State have effect throughout the Union |
Programme of measures on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to be followed by specific instruments |
Council / Commission |
Programme to be adopted by end 2000 |
Communication on mutual recognition of final decisions in criminal matters presented by the Commission in July 2000 |
- |
Application of mutual recognition to pre-trial orders |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal or a Member State initiative |
- |
In November 2000, France, Sweden and Belgium presented an initiative on the freezing of assets and evidenceThis lead to a framework decision from the Council |
- |
Examine the feasibility of improved cross-border cooperation on the transfer of proceedings and the enforcement of sentences |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal or a Member State initiative |
April 2004 |
To be included in Commission paper |
- |
Study the feasibility of extending and possibly formalising the exchange of information on criminal records |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal or a Member State initiative |
April 2004 |
To be included in Commission paper |
2.3 Greater convergence in civil law
Objective |
Action needed |
Responsibility |
Timetable for adoption |
State of play |
To eliminate obstacles created by disparities in law and procedures |
New procedural legislation in cross-border cases (e.g. provisional measures, taking of evidence, time limits) |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal or a Member State initiative. |
April 2004 |
Regulation on the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matters adopted by the Council in May 2001 |
- |
General study to identify and eliminate obstacles to the smooth functioning of civil proceedings |
Council to prepare a report |
End 2001 |
Commission to prepare draft agreement with Norway, Iceland and Switzerland |
- |
Finalising the Brussels and Lugano Conventions |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal |
April 2001 |
- |
- |
Drawing up a legal instrument on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations. |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal or a Member State initiative |
April 2001 |
Commission to prepare a communication, to be followed (if need be) by a draft regulation |
- |
Revising, where necessary, the 1980 Rome Convention. |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal or a Member State initiative |
April 2001 |
- |
- |
Preliminary study on the possibility of drawing up a legal instrument on the law applicable to divorce |
Council/ Commission |
April 2004 |
Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 adopted by the Council in May 2000 |
- |
Drawing up of a preliminary study on jurisdiction and the law applicable to matrimonial property and successions |
- |
April 2004 |
- |
3) UNION-WIDE FIGHT AGAINST CRIME
3.1 Union-wide crime prevention
Objectives |
Action needed |
Responsibility |
Timetable for adoption |
State of play |
To prevent crime through reduction of opportunities |
Identification and development of common priorities - policy guidelines - to be taken into account when preparing new legislation |
Council/ Commission/ Member States |
- |
Decision setting up a European crime prevention network adopted by the Council in May 2001Communication on crime prevention presented by the Commission in November 2000 |
- |
Integration of crime prevention aspects in actions and programmes against crime at the Union and Member State level - policy guidelines to be adopted by Council |
Council/ Commission/ Member States |
- |
- |
To facilitate cooperation between Member States |
Exchange of best practices and cooperation between national crime prevention authorities in priority areas. A Community- programme addressing such matters as juvenile, urban and drug-related crime has been set up. |
Council / Commission/ Member States |
2001 |
- |
3.2 Stepping up cooperation in the fight against crime
Objective |
Action needed |
Responsibility |
Timetable for adoption |
State of Play |
To coordinate and where appropriate, centralise proceedings |
Setting up joint investigative teams, as a first step, to combat trafficking in drugs and human beings as well as terrorism - when investigating cross-border crime |
Adoption of the MLA Convention; or Council, on the basis of an initiative by a Member State |
Without delay |
The Convention entered into force on 23 August 2005. It replaces Framework Decision 2002/465/JHA from the Council of 13 June 2002 on joint investigative teams |
- |
Setting up a unit composed of national prosecutors, magistrates or police officers of equivalent competence - EUROJUST |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal or a Member State initiative |
End 2001 |
Decision establishing Eurojust adopted by the Council in February 2002 |
Implement and where appropriate further develop the European Judicial Network |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal or a Member State initiative |
April 2001 |
- |
|
Prevent conflicts of jurisdiction by examining the possibility of registering proceedings pending in more than one Member State |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal or a Member State initiative |
April 2004 |
- |
|
To provide mutual assistance to the fullest extent possible |
Adoption, ratification and implementation of the Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters |
Council / Member States |
April 2001 |
Act establishing the Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters adopted by the Council in May 2000 |
Consider arrangements under which authorities may operate in the territory of another Member State |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal or a Member State initiative |
April 2001 |
- |
|
Examine the possibilities for harmonised rules on data protection |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal or a Member State initiative |
April 2001 |
Work started in Council, on the basis of a discussion paper by the Portuguese Presidency |
|
To protect rights of victims and to provide them with assistance |
Draw up minimum standards |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal or a Member State initiative |
April 2001 |
Framework Decision on the standing of victims adopted by the Council in March 2001 |
To develop operational police cooperation and law enforcement training at EU level |
Establishment of a European Police Chiefs' operational task force |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal or a Member State initiative |
2001 |
Council has begun discussion on the basis of a paper presented by the United Kingdom. |
- |
Setting up the European Police College, starting as a network of existing national training institutes |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal or a Member State initiative |
2001 |
Decision establishing a European Police College adopted by the Council in December 2000 |
To improve cooperation between customs authorities in the fight against crime |
Implementation of the CIS (Customs Information Systems) and Naples II Conventions. |
Member States |
Ongoing |
- |
- |
Closer cooperation of law enforcement authorities against smuggling |
- |
- |
- |
To foster international cooperation in the fight against transnational organised crime |
Adoption and ratification of the United Nations' Convention on transnational organised crime and the additional Protocols |
Council, Member States/ Commission |
For signature in late 2000 |
The Convention and its Protocols were signed in Palermo in December 2000 |
To reinforce the role of Europol in facilitating European cooperation in preventing and combating crime, with the necessary support and resources |
Extending the competence of Europol to cover money laundering in general, regardless of the offence from which the proceeds originate |
Council, on the basis of an initiative by a Member State |
- |
All these items are under discussion in Council |
- |
Examining the feasibility of setting up a database of pending cases |
Europol / Council |
- |
- |
- |
Enabling Europol to facilitate the preparation of specific investigative actions by the competent authorities of the Member States, including operational action by joint investigative teams |
Appropriate decision by Council needed |
April 2004, without delay for certain areas |
- |
- |
Adoption of measures allowing Europol to ask the competent authorities of the Member States to conduct and coordinate their investigations in specific cases and to develop specific expertise which may be put at the disposal of Member States to assist them in investigating organised crime |
Council, on the basis of an initiative by a Member State |
April 2004 |
- |
- |
Consideration to be given to possible review of the Europol Convention to cover new powers and the question of democratic and judicial control |
Council / Commission |
- |
- |
3.3 Fight against certain forms of crime
Objective |
Action needed |
Responsibility |
Timetable for adoption |
State of play |
To adopt a common approach throughout the EU on cross-border crime |
Criminalisation of trafficking in human beings and sexual exploitation of children with particular reference tochild pornography on the Internet |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal |
April 2001 |
Communication and proposal for a framework decision on trafficking in human beings presented by the Commission in December 2000 |
- |
Common definitions, charges and penalties in the field of drug trafficking |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal |
April 2001 |
Proposal for a framework decision on the constituent elements of criminal acts and penalties presented by the Commission in May 2001 |
- |
Common definitions, charges and penalties in the field of corruption |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal |
April 2001 |
Commission is preparing a policy paper |
- |
Common definitions, charges and penalties in the field of environmental crime |
Council |
April 2001 |
Denmark tabled (under Article 34) a proposal in January 2000Proposal for a Directive presented by the Commission in March 2001 |
Proposal on common charges for hooliganism |
Council, on the basis of an initiative by a Member State |
- |
Decision on the proposal of Belgium adopted in April 2002 |
|
- |
Common definitions, charges and penalties in the field of racism and xenophobia(framework decision) |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal or a Member State initiative |
April 2004 |
Second report on the implementation of the Joint Action of 15 July 1996 tabled in June 2000Proposal for a framework decision on combating racism and xenophobia presented by the Commission in November 2001 |
- |
Common definitions in the field of preventing and combating cyber-crime, including common charges and penalties for high-tech crime |
Council, on the basis of a proposal of the Commission |
April 2001 |
Communication on combating computer-related crime adopted by the Commission in January 2001 (COM(2000) 890 final)Proposal for a framework decision on attacks against information systems presented in April 2002 |
To adopt a common approach throughout the EU on cross-border crime |
Criminalisation of fraud involving non-cash means of payment |
Council, on the basis of a proposal of the Commission |
April 2001 |
Framework decision on combating fraud involving means of payment adopted in May 2001 |
- |
Common definitions, charges and penalties as regards counterfeiting of the Euro |
Council adopted a framework decision which was amended in 2001 |
April 2001 |
The Commission is preparing complementary measuresDecision establishing the " Pericles " programme adopted by the Council in December 2001 |
- |
Criminalisation of fraud in public contracts |
Council, on the basis of a Member State initiative |
April 2001 |
Germany presented an initiative in March 1999 |
- |
Reinforcing the legal framework for the protection of the Community's financial interests |
Council and Parliament, on the basis of a Commission proposal |
- |
Proposal for a Directive on protecting the Community's financial interests presented by the Commission in May 2001 |
3.4 Special action against money laundering
Objective |
Action needed |
Responsibility |
Timetable for adoption |
State of play |
To deprive criminals of the proceeds of crime |
Convention or framework decision on financial crime, money laundering |
Council, on the basis of an initiative by France |
- |
- |
- |
Concrete steps to trace, freeze, seize and confiscate the proceeds of crime |
- |
- |
The Council adopted Framework Decision 2003/577/JHA on the execution in the European Union of orders freezing property or evidence. |
To improve knowledge and ability to fight money laundering activities |
Implement fully the provisions of the Directive on money laundering, the 1990 Strasbourg Convention and the Financial Action Task Force recommendations, in the Member States and their dependent territories |
Member States |
- |
- |
- |
Adoption of the draft revised Directive on money laundering |
Council and Parliament |
As soon as possible |
Directive on prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering adopted in December 2001 |
- |
More rapid exchange of information between the existing financial intelligence units (FIU), enabling judicial authorities and FIU to receive information, regardless of secrecy provisions. |
Council, on the basis of an initiative by Finland |
- |
Decision 2000/642/JHA on the exchange of information between financial intelligence units adopted by the Council in October 2000 |
- |
Community rules must be drawn up to prevent the use of non-EU companies and organisations to launder the proceeds of crime |
Commission/ Council/Member States |
- |
- |
- |
Report identifying those provisions in national legislation on banking, finance and company law which obstruct international cooperation |
Commission |
- |
- |
- |
Widening the competence of Europol to cover money laundering in general, regardless of the offence from which the proceeds originate |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal or a Member State initiative |
- |
Discussion in Council and in Europol Management Board |
4) ISSUES RELATED TO INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL BORDERS AND VISA POLICY, IMPLEMENTATION OF ART. 62 TEC AND CONVERTING THE SCHENGEN ACQUIS
Objective |
Action needed |
Responsibility |
Timetable for adoption |
State of Play |
To develop a common visa policy |
Regulation on countries whose nationals are respectively exempt from, or subject to, visa requirements in the Member States of the European Union |
Council, on the basis of Commission proposal |
April 2001 |
Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 adopted in March 2001 |
- |
Procedure and conditions for issuing visas by Member States |
Commission/ Council/Member States |
April 2003 |
- |
- |
Rules on a uniform visa |
Council, on the basis of Commission proposal |
April 2001 |
- |
- |
Technical specifications of the uniform format for visas |
- |
Short term measures: 2000-02; - long term measures: 2004 |
Regulations (EC) No 333/2002 and 334/2002 adopted by the Council in February 2002 |
- |
Proposal for a regulation on an airport transit visa |
Commission/ Council/Member States |
April 2001 |
- |
- |
Closer cooperation between EU consulates in third countries |
Member States |
Ongoing process |
- |
- |
Measures on the freedom to travel within the territory of Member States |
Commission/ Council/Member States |
April 2001 |
- |
To develop a common policy on false documents |
Making documents more secure by introducing minimum standards for travel documents and residence permits |
Commission/ Council/Member States |
April 2001 |
- |
- |
Make false documents easier to detect, give the appropriate course with the equipment. |
Commission/ Council/Member States |
Ongoing process |
- |
To improve checks at the external borders of the Union |
Close cooperation between the Member States' border control services, such as exchange programmes and technology transfer |
Commission/ Council/Member States |
April 2001 |
- |
- |
Rapid inclusion of the applicant States in this cooperation |
- |
Ongoing process |
- |
To convert the Schengen acquis |
Communitarisation of Article 2(2) of the Schengen Convention (safeguard clause allowing the temporary reintroduction of border controls) |
Council/ Commission |
- |
- |
5) CITIZENSHIP OF THE UNION
Objective |
Actions needed |
Responsibility |
Timetable for adoption |
State of play |
To improve citizens' rights to move and reside freely within the Union |
Regulation updating and revising rules on the right of entry, movement and residence |
Commission |
2001 |
Proposal presented by the Commission in May 2001 |
- |
Report onCitizenship of the Union |
Commission |
By the end of 2000 |
- |
6) COOPERATION AGAINST DRUGS
Objective |
Action needed |
Responsibility |
Timetable for adoption |
State of Play |
Implementation of the EU Drugs Strategy for 2000-2004, endorsed by the European Council in Helsinki |
Report to the European Council on an EU action plan on drugs (2000-2004) |
Council to prepare report |
June 2000 |
- |
- |
Strengthening of cooperation with the European Monitoring Centre on Drugs and Drug Addiction and with Europol, in particular as regards synthetic drugs and precursors |
Council / Commission/ Member States |
- |
Conference organised by the European Parliament, Council and Commission on drugs policy (28 and 29 February 2000) |
- |
Development of a methodology for the evaluation of the EU Drugs Strategy for 2000-04 |
Council and Parliament, on the basis of a Commission proposal |
- |
- |
- |
Common definitions, charges and penalties for drug trafficking |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal |
April 2001 |
Proposal for a framework decision on the constituent elements of criminal acts and penalties presented by the Commission in May 200 |
- |
Improvement of police, customs and judicial cooperation in preventing and combating drug trafficking |
Council, on the basis of a Commission proposal or a Member State initiative |
- |
- |
7) STRONGER EXTERNAL ACTION
Objective |
Action needed |
Responsibility |
Timetable for adoption |
State of Play |
All powers and instruments at the disposal of the Union, and, in particular, those in the field of external relations, must be used in an integrated and consistent way. Justice and Home Affairs concerns must be integrated in the definition and in the implementation of other Union policies and activities |
- |
Council, in close cooperation with the Commission, to draw up specific recommendations |
June 2000 |
- |
For more information on the state of play, please consult the website of the European Parliament's Committee on Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs
4) implementing measures
On 30 November 2000 the Commission presented a communication to the Council and to the European Parliament which contained the half-yearly update of the scoreboard, reviewing progress in establishing an area of "freedom, security and justice" in the European Union [COM(2000) 782 final - not yet published].
On 23 May 2001, the Commission presented a communication to the Council and to the European Parliament which contained the half-yearly update of the scoreboard, reviewing progress in establishing an area of "freedom, security and justice" in the European Union [COM(2001) 278 final - not yet published].
On 30 October 2001, the Commission presented a communication to the Council and to the European Parliament which contained the half-yearly update of the scoreboard, reviewing progress in establishing an area of "freedom, security and justice" in the European Union [COM(2001) 628 final - not yet published].
On 30 May 2002, the Commission presented a communication to the Council and to the European Parliament which contained the half-yearly update of the scoreboard, reviewing progress in establishing an area of "freedom, security and justice" in the European Union [COM(2002) 261 final - not yet published].
5) follow-up work
Last updated: 17.10.2005