EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2006/294/34
Case C-365/05 P: Order of the Court of 5 October 2006 — Dorte Schmidt-Brown v Commission of the European Communities (Appeal — Officials — Duty to provide assistance — Rejection of request for financial assistance in defamation proceedings brought before the United Kingdom courts)
Case C-365/05 P: Order of the Court of 5 October 2006 — Dorte Schmidt-Brown v Commission of the European Communities (Appeal — Officials — Duty to provide assistance — Rejection of request for financial assistance in defamation proceedings brought before the United Kingdom courts)
Case C-365/05 P: Order of the Court of 5 October 2006 — Dorte Schmidt-Brown v Commission of the European Communities (Appeal — Officials — Duty to provide assistance — Rejection of request for financial assistance in defamation proceedings brought before the United Kingdom courts)
OB C 294, 2.12.2006, p. 20–20
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
2.12.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 294/20 |
Order of the Court of 5 October 2006 — Dorte Schmidt-Brown v Commission of the European Communities
(Case C-365/05 P) (1)
(Appeal - Officials - Duty to provide assistance - Rejection of request for financial assistance in defamation proceedings brought before the United Kingdom courts)
(2006/C 294/34)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Dorte Schmidt-Brown (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, avocats)
Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Curral and L. Lozano Palacios, Agents, and D. Waelbroeck, avocat)
Re:
Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 5 July 2005 in Case T-387/02 Schmidt-Brown v Commission dismissing the action for annulment of the Commission's decision of 26 April 2002 rejecting the applicant's request for financial assistance from the Commission in a defamation action brought by the applicant against a company before the High Court of Justice (England and Wales)
Operative part of the order
1. |
The appeal is dismissed; |
2. |
Ms Schmidt-Brown shall bear the costs. |