Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2006/281/57

    Joined Cases T-304/04 and T-316/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 6 September 2006 — Italy and Wam v Commission (State aid — Loans at reduced rates intended to make it possible to become established in certain non-member countries — Effect on trade between Member States and distortion of competition — Statement of reasons)

    OB C 281, 18.11.2006, p. 33–33 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    18.11.2006   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 281/33


    Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 6 September 2006 — Italy and Wam v Commission

    (Joined Cases T-304/04 and T-316/04) (1)

    (State aid - Loans at reduced rates intended to make it possible to become established in certain non-member countries - Effect on trade between Member States and distortion of competition - Statement of reasons)

    (2006/C 281/57)

    Language of the case: Italian

    Parties

    Applicants: Italian Republic (represented initially by A. Cingolo, and subsequently by P. Gentili, lawyers) and Wam SpA (Cavezzo di Modena, Italy) (represented by E. Giliani, lawyer)

    Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: V. Di Bucci and E. Righini, Agents)

    Re:

    Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2006/177/EC of 19 May 2004 on State aid No C 4/2003 (ex NN 102/2002) implemented by Italy for WAM SpA (OJ 2006 L 63, p. 11).

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Annuls Commission Decision 2006/177/EC of 19 May 2004 on State aid No C 4/2003 (ex NN 102/2002) implemented by Italy for WAM SpA (OJ 2006 L 63, p. 11);

    2.

    Dismisses the actions as to the remainder;

    3.

    Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred, in Case T-304/04, by the Italian Republic and, in Case T-316/04, by Wam, including those relating to the interim proceedings.


    (1)  OJ C 251 of 9.10.2004.


    Top