Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2006/249/02

Case C-268/05 P: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 February 2006 — Giorgio Lebedef v Commission of the European Communitites (Appeal — Officials — Rules on the levels, body, and procedures of consultation agreed between the majority of trade unions and staff associations and the Commission — Exclusion of the union Action et Défense — Manifest inadmissibility)

OB C 249, 14.10.2006, p. 1–1 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

14.10.2006   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 249/1


Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 February 2006 — Giorgio Lebedef v Commission of the European Communitites

(Case C-268/05 P) (1)

(Appeal - Officials - Rules on the levels, body, and procedures of consultation agreed between the majority of trade unions and staff associations and the Commission - Exclusion of the union ‘Action et Défense’ - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2006/C 249/02)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Giorgio Lebedef (represented by: G. Bounéou and F. Frabetti, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and V. Joris, acting as Agents)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment delivered on 12 April 2005 by the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) in Case T-191/02 Lebedef v Commission, dismissing the action for annulment of the Commission's decision to repudiate the Agreement of 20 September 1974 on Relations between the Commission and the Trade Unions and Staff Associations, and to adopt again the Operational Rules on the consultation levels, the consultation body and related procedures agreed between the Commission and the majority of trade unions and staff associations on 19 January 2000, which had been annulled by the Court of First Instance in its judgment of 15 November 2001, in so far as they excluded the union ‘Action et Défense’ from the consultation body.

Operative part of the order

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

2.

Mr Lebedef is ordered to pay the costs.


(1)  OJ C 243, 01.10.2006.


Top