Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document C2006/121/31

Case T-105/06: Action brought on 7 April 2006 — InterVideo v OHIM

OB C 121, 20.5.2006, p. 17–17 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

20.5.2006   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 121/17

Action brought on 7 April 2006 — InterVideo v OHIM

(Case T-105/06)

(2006/C 121/31)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: InterVideo, Inc. (California, USA) (represented by: K. Manhaeve, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

—

Annul the decision of the Board of Appeal of 31 January 2006;

—

order the defendant to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘WinDVD Creator’ for goods in class 9 — application No 4 106 936

Decision of the examiner: Refusal of the application

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Pleas in law: Violation of Articles 4 and 7(1)(b) and (c) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as the Board of Appeal has defined the relevant public incorrectly. The relevant public is, according to the applicant, the average consumer and not PC users familiar with specific computer language.

Top