EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2006/096/19

Case T-194/03: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 23 February 2006 — Il Ponte Finanziaria v OHIM (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark composed of the word Bainbridge — Earlier national, figurative three-dimensional and word marks including the word Bridge — Proof of use — Use in a different form — Defensive trade marks — Family of trade marks)

OB C 96, 22.4.2006, p. 11–11 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

22.4.2006   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/11


Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 23 February 2006 — Il Ponte Finanziaria v OHIM

(Case T-194/03) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark composed of the word ‘Bainbridge’ - Earlier national, figurative three-dimensional and word marks including the word ‘Bridge’ - Proof of use - Use in a different form - ‘Defensive’ trade marks - Family of trade marks)

(2006/C 96/19)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties:

Applicant: Il Ponte Finanziaria (Scandicci, Italy) (represented by: P.L. Roncaglia, A. Torrigiani Malaspina and M. Boletto, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: M. Buffolo and O. Montalto, agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Marine Enterprise Projects — Società Unipersonale di Alberto Fiorenzi Srl (Numana, Italy) (represented by: D. Marchi, lawyer)

Action

brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 March 2003 (Case R 1015/2001-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Il Ponte Finanziaria SpA and Marine Enterprise Projects — Società Unipersonale di Alberto Fiorenzi Srl

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

dismisses the action;

2.

orders the applicant to pay the costs.


(1)  OJ 2003 C 184.


Top